RE: [Nant-users] depreciated...

2005-06-03 Thread John Cole
>>Also, can I ask how did you notice this deprecation? >>(I couldn't see it in the nightly readme.html) I found it by using a recent build of NAnt from CVS (.85.0.1972 I rebuild myself to put in a few interop dll's our custom scripts need). When I ran a test build, my logs nearly doubled beca

RE: [Nant-users] depreciated...

2005-06-02 Thread McKenna, Simon (RGH)
John quoth: -> I noticed that has been depreciated. This should be reflected -> in the documentation and an example of how the statement be used -> instead of the . Thanks for the heads-up John. Initially I thought deprecating didn't seem right (weird looking test conditions)...but then I fo

[Nant-users] depreciated...

2005-06-02 Thread John Cole
I noticed that has been depreciated. This should be reflected in the documentation and an example of how the statement be used instead of the . Thanks, John Cole - This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the us