On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hmm, the uchar.h header is AFAICS at wrong place. It should be in
>>> mingw-w64-header/crt instead.
>>>
>>
>> Is it not there already??
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kai
>>
2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hmm, the uchar.h header is AFAICS at wrong place. It should be in
>> mingw-w64-header/crt instead.
>>
>
> Is it not there already??
>
>> Cheers,
>> Kai
>>
>
> --
> O.S.
Duh, sorry. It is getting late for me. Time t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hmm, the uchar.h header is AFAICS at wrong place. It should be in
> mingw-w64-header/crt instead.
>
Is it not there already??
> Cheers,
> Kai
>
--
O.S.
--
All the d
Hmm, the uchar.h header is AFAICS at wrong place. It should be in
mingw-w64-header/crt instead.
Cheers,
Kai
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, appl
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Ok, thanks. Please apply to trunk.
>
> Cheers,
> Kai
OK. See rev. 4507:
http://mingw-w64.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mingw-w64?view=revision&revision=4507
Hopefully placed files correctly.
Note that this may need further work:
- The __cpluspl
Ok, thanks. Please apply to trunk.
Cheers,
Kai
2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
>>
>> 2
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
>>> wrote:
2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
>
> 2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
> > Why does mingw-w64 not have
2011/9/27 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
> Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> typedefs a
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
>>>
>>> 2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
>>> > Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
>>> > typedefs and some functions (which can easi
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
>>
>> 2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
>> > Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
>> > typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
>> > Win32 API IMHO).
>> >
>> >
2011/9/26 Kai Tietz
> 2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
> > Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> > typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
> > Win32 API IMHO).
> >
> > See the draft proposal here:
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/
Op 26 sep. 2011 23:11 schreef "Ruben Van Boxem"
het volgende:
>
> Op 26 sep. 2011 22:56 schreef "Ozkan Sezer" het
volgende:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> > wrote:
> > > Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> > > typedefs and some f
Op 26 sep. 2011 22:56 schreef "Ozkan Sezer" het
volgende:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> > typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
> > Win32 API IMHO).
> >
2011/9/26 Ruben Van Boxem :
> Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
> Win32 API IMHO).
>
> See the draft proposal here:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1040.pdf
>
> The reas
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
> typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
> Win32 API IMHO).
>
> See the draft proposal here:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/w
Why does mingw-w64 not have a uchar.h header file? There's only a few
typedefs and some functions (which can easily be implemented through the
Win32 API IMHO).
See the draft proposal here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1040.pdf
The reason I ask is because the C++11 standard men
17 matches
Mail list logo