On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jon wrote:
> > But "interpreting" or "implying" or "inferring" is not useful. Explicit
> > clarification
> > from Kai and JonY as mingw-w64 leaders is needed. I suspect one reason why
> > this hasn't
> > happened is th
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jon wrote:
>
>
...SNIP...
>
But "interpreting" or "implying" or "inferring" is not useful. Explicit
> clarification
> from Kai and JonY as mingw-w64 leaders is needed. I suspect one reason why
> this hasn't
> happened is that both already have too much on their
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> > - package gnustep which will help test the objc toolchain
>
> Have you seen http://www.cocotron.org/ too?
I hadn't. It's interesting but at the same time, I'm a bit worried
because they mention patching ld and gcc. =/
In any case, I'll have a look at
> - package gnustep which will help test the objc toolchain
Have you seen http://www.cocotron.org/ too?
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Adrien Nader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, Jon wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>> > a) yes, b) yes (we need people
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, Jon wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
> Kai Tietz wrote:
> > a) yes, b) yes (we need people in charge for that and doing this
> > reliable), c) yes, we are actual in discussion with mingw-builds
> > venture to go together (and/or co-operate more closely).
> >
I think everyone's got their own build systems, LRN has one,
mingw-builds have theirs, Ruben has his, you've got yours (kudos for
using PowerShell though, I didn't know anyone did that ;-))
I wish I had the time to investigate porting either nix or homebrew to
Windows, but that'd just be another b
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2013/7/10 Jon :
> >> > > While the question about what current users are using is already hard
> >> > > to answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there
> >> > > that aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking i
2013/7/10 Jon :
>> > > While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
>> > > answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
>> > > aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe
>> > > a year ago, only to find out that
> > > While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
> > > answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
> > > aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe
> > > a year ago, only to find out that
> > > - there's no
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Koehne Kai wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adrien Nader [mailto:adr...@notk.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:31 PM
> > To: Ruben Van Boxem
> > Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Min
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Martin Mitáš wrote:
>
> On 10.7.2013 8:58, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
> >
> > While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
> > answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
> > aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looki
On 10.7.2013 8:58, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
> While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
> answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
> aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe a
> year ago, only to find out
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Nader [mailto:adr...@notk.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:31 PM
> To: Ruben Van Boxem
> Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] End of rubenvb builds
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for answeri
--
Alexpux
Отправлено с помощью Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
воскресенье, 7 июля 2013 г. в 16:31, Adrien Nader написал:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could catch up
> properly only now.
>
> This email is unfortunately a bit long, sorry for
Hi,
Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could catch up
properly only now.
This email is unfortunately a bit long, sorry for that too.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
> the
On 6/25/2013 23:07, Jon wrote:
> But it's a Bad Thing that mingw-w64 doesn't have official, user-friendly
> toolchains,
> even if (for pragmatic reasons) only windows hosted and a linux host
> cross-compilers
> are provided. The current automated builds (apparently targeted to internal
> testing
> That you think that mingw-builds is doing a better job as you did is
> at least for our community a least one good news ... nevertheless is
> mingw-builds a different venture, and I am not sure if we should drop
> that easy our own toolchains. I admit that as long as mingw-builds is
> well maint
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
>> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>>
>> I strongly encourage you to use
I wanted to compile GNUStep(objc) on windows because I would like to
debug something and thus I prefer compile everything
on windows and not cross-compile from linux.
A few years ago I have built an environment(called MaxGW :-) consisting
in the msys+mingw and their package manager mingw-get
but
2013/6/24 Ozkan Sezer
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz
> wrote:
> > Hello Ruben,
> >
> > 2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem :
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
> to
> >> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Ruben,
>
> 2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem :
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
>> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>>
>> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of
Hello Ruben,
2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>
> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of
> configurations available at min
2013/6/24 Ozkan Sezer
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
> to
> > the table for me to continue maintaining them.
> >
> > I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolc
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>
> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of
> configurations a
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Earnie Boyd
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> > 2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
> >>
> >> And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
> >> downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
>
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> 2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
>>
>> And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
>> downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
>> page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't downl
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
> And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
> downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
> page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
> repository.txt or some such). We really need a build t
Le 23/06/2013 21:00, Ruben Van Boxem a écrit :
>
>
> I didn't even know they had an installer. Just download the zips:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/files/?source=navbar
>
> And be done with it. I tend to avoid installers when it comes to
> development related things.
>
> Ruben
jus
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
> And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
> downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
> page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
> repository.txt or some such). We really need a build t
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
repository.txt or some such). We really need a build that "just works". (I
know, your buil
2013/6/23 LRN
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 23.06.2013 17:15, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
> to
> > the table for me to continue maintaining them.
> >
> > I strongly encourage you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.06.2013 17:15, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>
> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains
I used your builds too. I dont remember why, probably cause it was the
first one I found that just worked. I'll give the mingw-builds a try.
Thank you for your work.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:04 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Hello Ruben!
>
> OOooohhh NOoO!!!
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:15
Hello Ruben!
OOooohhh NOoO!!!
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
> the table for me to continue maintaining them.
>
> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of to
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude
of configurations available at mingw-builds. Comparing download numbers
they have a much
35 matches
Mail list logo
