On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to >> the table for me to continue maintaining them. >> >> I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of >> configurations available at mingw-builds. Comparing download numbers they >> have a much higher visibility, and e.g. their adoption by the Qt Project >> speaks of their quality. They have succeeded in doing what I missed when I >> decided to start building GCC, so my effort spent in doing that is now >> wasted. > > That's sad. I was using your builds from time to time, too.
You used to distribute your own builds, too :) > Perhaps you can document your build process in the project > resources, e.g. place your scripts in the svn somewhere or > something? svn/experimental/buildsystem is a perfect place to upload scripts. >> >> I may dabble into getting Clang 3.3 to work on Windows, perhaps even with >> libc++, but I am not promising anything. >> >> I'll still linger around here though, don't worry. >> >> All the best, >> >> Ruben > > -- > O.S. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
