On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 15 16:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar 15 06:09, JonY wrote:
>> > On 3/14/2013 23:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > What two build systems? It's a fairly simple patch which allows the
>> > > normal user of ming
Hi,
On Mar 15 16:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 15 06:09, JonY wrote:
> > On 3/14/2013 23:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > What two build systems? It's a fairly simple patch which allows the
> > > normal user of mingw64 to build the entire source tree in a single
> > > `configure; m
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:24 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 3/15/2013 8:14 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>>> The headers seem to get built along with all the other subtrees... ?
>> Curious... when configuring the crt, which headers is it checking
On 3/15/2013 8:14 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>> The headers seem to get built along with all the other subtrees... ?
> Curious... when configuring the crt, which headers is it checking for
> _mingw_mac.h? The soon-to-be-built ones, or the
> alr
On 3/15/2013 22:14, NightStrike wrote:
> Curious... when configuring the crt, which headers is it checking for
> _mingw_mac.h? The soon-to-be-built ones, or the
> already-installed-as-part-of-the-toolchain ones? Similarly, which is
> it compiling against?
>
It is a sanity check, to make sure we
On Mar 15 06:09, JonY wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 23:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > What two build systems? It's a fairly simple patch which allows the
> > normal user of mingw64 to build the entire source tree in a single
> > `configure; make; make install', nothing more, nothing less. I don't
>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:55 AM, John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 8:54 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>>> $(RUNTIME_SRC)/configure --build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --enable-lib32
>>> --enable-sdk=all --with-libraries=libmangle --with-tools=all
>>> --
On 3/14/2013 8:54 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>> $(RUNTIME_SRC)/configure --build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --enable-lib32
>> --enable-sdk=all --with-libraries=libmangle --with-tools=all
>> --prefix=$(RUNTIME_STAGE)
>> make
>> make install
>>
>> If GCC o
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 6:26 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>>> Just to throw another data point out there, I use top-level configure
>>> for TDM-GCC (i.e. an x86_64-w64-mingw32 native bootstrap). It see
On 3/14/2013 6:26 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
>> Just to throw another data point out there, I use top-level configure
>> for TDM-GCC (i.e. an x86_64-w64-mingw32 native bootstrap). It seems to
>> work and is far easier than building each sub-tree
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John E. / TDM wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 1:00 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>>> On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote:
When you say "full mingw tree", do you mean that you are building crt,
headers, and t
On 3/14/2013 1:00 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
>> On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote:
>>> When you say "full mingw tree", do you mean that you are building crt,
>>> headers, and tools using the top level configure/make, as opposed to
>>> bui
On 3/14/2013 23:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> What two build systems? It's a fairly simple patch which allows the
> normal user of mingw64 to build the entire source tree in a single
> `configure; make; make install', nothing more, nothing less. I don't
> understand why the unnecessary complic
On Mar 14 15:00, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mar 13 16:18, NightStrike wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinn
On 3/14/13 8:00 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> Pretty much nobody uses the top level configure. It
> was an idea that I had that nobody really wanted, and so it fell into
> disuse and doesn't really work (which I guess is what you are seeing).
Personally I like the idea of top level configure, *but* th
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>> > On Mar 13 16:18, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >>
On Mar 14 23:30, JonY wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 18:41, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2013/3/14 Corinna Vinschen
> >
> >> On Mar 14 11:13, m...@morous.org wrote:
> >>>
>
> You *have* to install the headers first as a prerequisite for the crt
> >> to
> work. There are generated headers requ
On 3/14/2013 18:41, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2013/3/14 Corinna Vinschen
>
>> On Mar 14 11:13, m...@morous.org wrote:
>>>
You *have* to install the headers first as a prerequisite for the crt
>> to
work. There are generated headers required for the CRT, not a plain and
simple -
On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 13 16:18, NightStrike wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but
>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 13 16:18, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but
>> > I think it's still helpful and maybe the opini
2013/3/14 Corinna Vinschen
> On Mar 14 11:13, m...@morous.org wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You *have* to install the headers first as a prerequisite for the crt
> to
> > > work. There are generated headers required for the CRT, not a plain and
> > > simple -I.
> >
> > Many packages generate headers or
On Mar 14 11:13, m...@morous.org wrote:
>
> >
> > You *have* to install the headers first as a prerequisite for the crt to
> > work. There are generated headers required for the CRT, not a plain and
> > simple -I.
>
> Many packages generate headers or some sources. Consider config.h.in ->
> confi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.03.2013 10:37, schrieb JonY:
> On 3/14/2013 16:51, Rainer Emrich wrote:
>> I just kick in because Corrina is completly right. A common case as for
>> me, is to update the mingw-w64 runtime for an existing installation. So
>> what you want, is to
>
> You *have* to install the headers first as a prerequisite for the crt to
> work. There are generated headers required for the CRT, not a plain and
> simple -I.
Many packages generate headers or some sources. Consider config.h.in ->
config.h as the most common case. I cannot see that as a reas
On 3/14/2013 16:51, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> I just kick in because Corrina is completly right. A common case as for me, is
> to update the mingw-w64 runtime for an existing installation. So what you
> want, is to compile the runtime in one go, configue, make, make install.
> That's impossible for no
On Mar 14 10:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm really confused about the unnecessary complexity. I don't
> want to "stage" anything. I would like to be able call
>
> configure --prefix=...
> make
> make install
>
> That's a pretty standard scenario. But here's what happens: Tr
On Mar 13 16:18, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but
> > I think it's still helpful and maybe the opinions have changed a bit.
>
> Sorry.. did I refuse it? Can you link t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 13.03.2013 21:18, schrieb NightStrike:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but I
>> think it's still helpful and maybe the opinions have changed
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but
> I think it's still helpful and maybe the opinions have changed a bit.
Sorry.. did I refuse it? Can you link to the mailing list archive (I
understand that the
Hi,
I'd like to resurrect a patch which has been refused last year, but
I think it's still helpful and maybe the opinions have changed a bit.
For people building just the latest mingw64-headers and mingw64-crt,
it's kind of surprising that mingw64-crt requires that the headers
are already install
30 matches
Mail list logo
