On 3/14/2013 1:00 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mar 14 10:53, NightStrike wrote: >>> When you say "full mingw tree", do you mean that you are building crt, >>> headers, and tools using the top level configure/make, as opposed to >>> building each thing you want independently? >> Exactly. Doing that is a fairly typical scenario, isn't it? > Actually, no. Pretty much nobody uses the top level configure. It > was an idea that I had that nobody really wanted, and so it fell into > disuse and doesn't really work (which I guess is what you are seeing). > > If you want top level configure to work again, give me some time and > I'll work on it to make it useful. There's actually numerous problems > with it, not just the hokiness of trying to stage a headers install.
Just to throw another data point out there, I use top-level configure for TDM-GCC (i.e. an x86_64-w64-mingw32 native bootstrap). It seems to work and is far easier than building each sub-tree individually. -John E. / TDM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
