On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 16:57, LIU Hao wrote:
>
> 在 2024-06-06 21:33, Daniel Bonniot 写道:
> > Thanks for your explanation. Even if it's customary, is there any
> > benefit in *not* applying this patch?
> >
>
> I think an argument would be that we try to maintain similar user experience
> with Micros
在 2024-06-06 21:33, Daniel Bonniot 写道:
Thanks for your explanation. Even if it's customary, is there any
benefit in *not* applying this patch?
I think an argument would be that we try to maintain similar user experience with Microsoft Windows
SDK, unless it's impossible.
--
Best regards,
L
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 08:21, LIU Hao wrote:
>
> 在 2024-05-30 21:14, Daniel Bonniot 写道:
> > This can be worked around by the user by adding a #include
> > before, but it can be confusing/surprising at first.
> > Since minwinbase.h depends on definitions from minwindef.h, wouldn't
> > it be cleaner
在 2024-05-30 21:14, Daniel Bonniot 写道:
This can be worked around by the user by adding a #include
before, but it can be confusing/surprising at first.
Since minwinbase.h depends on definitions from minwindef.h, wouldn't
it be cleaner if it included it?
My apologies if this is a bad idea for some
Hello,
Compiling a program which only includes minwinbase.h (or winbase.h)
fails with about a hundred errors, starting with:
mingw-w64-headers/include/minwinbase.h:16:5: error: ‘DWORD’ does not name a type
16 | DWORD nLength;
| ^
This can be worked around by the user by adding a #in
