On 1/19/15, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Patch looks ok to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Kai
>
Since no one else did, I applied and pushed this to master for dw.
--
O.S.
> 2015-01-18 0:48 GMT+01:00 dw :
>> Re-sending since SF seems to have eaten the first one.
>>
>> A while back snow_xmas reported a problem compili
A new binary release of the ELLCC cross compilation tool chain is available,
ELLCC is a pre-packaged set of tools based on clang/LLVM designed to
support cross compilation for a variety of target processors.
The ELLCC run-time libraries are all covered with BSD-like licenses:
* libc++The C
Patch looks ok to me.
So, we should try to go this route for other "secured"-API, too. We
should try to emulate missing functions here in libmingwex. by this
we can remove the need for user to know what API is present on what OS
Thanks,
Kai
2015-01-19 12:35 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban :
> ---
>
---
mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/time_s.h | 62
--
mingw-w64-headers/crt/time.h | 31 +++--
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/time_s.h
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_
Patch looks ok to me.
Thanks,
Kai
2015-01-18 0:48 GMT+01:00 dw :
> Re-sending since SF seems to have eaten the first one.
>
> A while back snow_xmas reported a problem compiling mingw-w64 with clang. I
> made a change, but he disappeared before approving the fix. I have just had
> a clang expert
