Patch looks ok to me. Thanks, Kai
2015-01-18 0:48 GMT+01:00 dw <limegreenso...@yahoo.com>: > Re-sending since SF seems to have eaten the first one. > > A while back snow_xmas reported a problem compiling mingw-w64 with clang. I > made a change, but he disappeared before approving the fix. I have just had > a clang expert take a look, and while he had some comments about the coding > style, functionally he was ok with the change. > > This won't completely fix snow_xmas' problem, since he was trying to > re-build mingw-w64 from scratch with clang. I believe that still won't work > (for other reasons). However, if people are using clang with a pre-built > mingw-w64 (which I'm told *is* a supported scenario), the attached patch > should help. > > dw > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
