Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

kai.koe...@nokia.com schreef op di 11-09-2012 om 14:55 [+]: > I haven't found a stock native MinGW 64 bit package yet that can compile Qt 5 > + Qt Creator. Peter seems willing to experiment with a custom package, but I > personally do not see this for 5.0 . Hi, Just wanted to let you guys

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

2012/9/24 Jon > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > wrote: > > 2012/9/24 Ozkan Sezer > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > >> wrote: > >> > 2012/9/24 Jon > >> >> > >> >> > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in > >> >> > > `i686-w64-mingw

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012/9/24 NightStrike > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, K. Frank wrote: > > Hello Kai (and Qt Folks)! > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, wrote: > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: ext Loaden [mailto:loa...@gmail.com] > >>> ... > >> > >> There's nothing wrong with cross-compil

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

Hi NightStrike! Please let me clarify my comments, below. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, K. Frank wrote: >> Hello Kai (and Qt Folks)! >> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, wrote: -Original Message- From: ext Loaden [

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2012/9/24 Ozkan Sezer >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ruben Van Boxem >> wrote: >> > 2012/9/24 Jon >> >> >> >> > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in >> >> > > `i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, K. Frank wrote: > Hello Kai (and Qt Folks)! > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ext Loaden [mailto:loa...@gmail.com] >>> ... >> >> There's nothing wrong with cross-compilation. But what we need first and >> fore

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012/9/24 K. Frank > Hi Ruben! > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > wrote: > > 2012/9/24 K. Frank > > > >> Hello Ruben! > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > >> wrote: > >> > Hi everyone, > >> > > >> > I started investigating my gdb build's slowness. >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

Hi Ruben! On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2012/9/24 K. Frank > >> Hello Ruben! >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ruben Van Boxem >> wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > I started investigating my gdb build's slowness. >> > ... >> ... >> So I see what Ruben sees (mo

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

> 2012/9/24 Ozkan Sezer > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > > wrote: > > > 2012/9/24 Jon > > >> > > >> > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in > > >> > > `i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7z` > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > Yes, that's to be e

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012/9/24 K. Frank > Hello Ruben! > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I started investigating my gdb build's slowness. > > ... > > When I do > > gdb testapp > > set verbose on > > run > > > > I see that the extra time is spent in the "Loading Sy

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

Hello Ruben! On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I started investigating my gdb build's slowness. > ... > When I do > gdb testapp > set verbose on > run > > I see that the extra time is spent in the "Loading Symbols from" > QtCore4d.dll (2 vs 6 seconds) and

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2012/9/24 Ozkan Sezer >> >> FWIW, I just tagged and released v1.0.7 and v2.0.7 mingw-w64 headers and >> crt. > > > I had a feeling this would happen :P > > I am uploading updated mingw-w64 v2.0.7 update packages "update" on > Sourceforge: >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

2012/9/24 Ozkan Sezer > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ruben Van Boxem > wrote: > > 2012/9/24 Jon > >> > >> > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in > >> > > `i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7z` > >> > > > >> > > >> > Yes, that's to be expected. There was no

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

Hi everyone, I started investigating my gdb build's slowness. I am currently comparing mingw-builds vs my builds and notice a 6-8 (mingw-builds) vs 14-16 (mine) second startup time of a simple QWidget application. I have tried the GDB 7.5 release, and I see the same results. For simplicity's sake,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: > 2012/9/24 Jon >> >> > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in >> > > `i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7z` >> > > >> > >> > Yes, that's to be expected. There was no new tagged MinGW-w64 release. >> > The >>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libuv build fail with 32bit rubenvb 4.7.1

2012/9/24 Jon > > > fyi...the following libuv build fail still exists in > > > `i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7z` > > > > > > > Yes, that's to be expected. There was no new tagged MinGW-w64 release. > The > > previous easy fix still applies. > > > > Ruben > > Yes, using tagged