2012/9/24 NightStrike <[email protected]>

> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:51 AM, K. Frank <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello Kai (and Qt Folks)!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ext Loaden [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> ...
> >>
> >> There's nothing wrong with cross-compilation. But what we need first
> and foremost is a reliable, native MinGW environment for developing Qt
> applications, since the vast majority of Qt developers that develop for
> Windows also develop _on_ Windows. Now one can argue that Qt itself could
> still be compiled using a cross-compiler. But if we're not able to compile
> Qt ourselves with the native toolchain, how can we be sure other complex
> apps will work?
> >>
> >> I haven't found a stock native MinGW 64 bit package yet that can
> compile Qt 5 + Qt Creator. Peter seems willing to experiment with a custom
> package, but I personally do not see this for 5.0 .
> >>
> >> I think for 5.0 , we should therefore only put MinGW 32 bit gcc 4.7 as
> Tier 2 or (preferably) Tier 1 platform. Support for MinGW 64 bit would be
> on a best effort basis (Tier 3).
> >>
> >> Now for 5.1 (that is, earliest May 2013) we should definitely
> reevaluate MinGW 64 bit as Tier 1 or Tier 2.
> >>
> >> What do you all think? I certainly don't want to discourage any effort
> in getting MinGW-64 bit and Qt 5 to work, but rather want to be realistic
> in  what we should aim for with 5.0.
> >
> > Just my personal opinion:
> >
> > As much as I like mingw-w64, I think, as a practical matter, if
> > working to get Qt 5.0 to build nicely with mingw-w64 would delay
> > Qt 5.0 by a significant amount, then I would skip it.  Better to
> > move forward with Qt 5.0, and hope to get mingw-w64 support
> > for Qt 5.1.
>
> What exactly does not work?  Can you build a 32-bit Qt using a
> mingw-w64 32-bit toolchain?
>

Just to put this on the radar, my attempt at building Qt 5 currently
strands here:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-26601

I have no idea how to solve this unfortunately, as qmake seems to mess up
the link order.

Ruben


> You have our full support to get whatever's broken to work.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to