On 9/12/12, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>
>> I applied the v2.x patch at rev. 5396. Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> O.S.
>>
>
> I saw you update revstamp.h too, which file generate revstamp.h ?
>
To my knowledge, absolutely nothing: only the auto-builds' scr
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>
> I applied the v2.x patch at rev. 5396. Thanks.
>
> --
> O.S.
>
I saw you update revstamp.h too, which file generate revstamp.h ?
I also saw jon_y applied to trunk at r5395 without update ChangeLog.
Regards,
Dongsheng
Hi, any news on this issue? Can I help in some way?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discu
On 9/12/12, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Kai Tietz
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Dongsheng,
>>>
>>> patch looks ok. Just one nit I see. Within that patch also a change
>>> to testsuite's make is made. For that a cha
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>
> Oh, My automake is 1.11.6, mingw-w64 use 1.12.2. please re-generate
> Makefile.in yourself.
>
My preference is to not store the auto generated files in the
repository and have the configuration set to ignore the generated
files so the gene
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Dongsheng Song
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello Dongsheng,
>>
>> patch looks ok. Just one nit I see. Within that patch also a change
>> to testsuite's make is made. For that a changelog entry is missing.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kai
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Dongsheng,
>
> patch looks ok. Just one nit I see. Within that patch also a change
> to testsuite's make is made. For that a changelog entry is missing.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
I do not change testsuite, I only change Makefile.am, then run
2012/9/12 kai.koehne:
> lib_pch.h.gch directory actually is 138 MB which means it's by far the
> largest precompiled header in Qt. WE're probably hitting some boundary here ,
> see also
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10841306/cc1plus-exe-crash-when-using-large-precompiled-header-file
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Ray Donnelly [mailto:mingw.andr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:59 PM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] cc1plus.exe crash (x86_64-mingw-w64-gcc-
> 4.7.1-release-c, c++, fortran-sjlj-rev3.7z)
>
Hello Dongsheng,
patch looks ok. Just one nit I see. Within that patch also a change
to testsuite's make is made. For that a changelog entry is missing.
Regards,
Kai
2012/9/12 Dongsheng Song :
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> These 2 attachments tr
K. Frank wrote:
> >> Kai wrote:
> >>> [...] The only other
> >>> difference from the log is that rubenv's gdb also prints some '=cmd-param-
> >>> changed,param="' messages, while mingw-builds does not.
> >>
> >> What log is this? I haven't notices gdb emitting any unexpected messages,
> >> but
>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Sisyphus wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lajos Foldy"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] -ffloat-store not needed with 64-bit
> compiler
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Sisyphus
>> wrot
12 matches
Mail list logo
