> Well, the issue seems to be that a mutex, which is already up to be
> destroyed, is still waited to return. I allowed for this that a mutex
> can be destroyed even if another thread waits for lock for it. You
> may want to test revision 5250.
Thank you I will try it.
>Which edition MinGW64 G
2012/7/23 Corinna Vinschen :
> On Jul 21 11:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 20 20:46, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> > 2012/7/20 Ozkan Sezer :
>> > > On 7/20/12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >> [...]
>> > >> Oh, I forgot something else. All other EAI_xxx values are defined
>> > >> in terms of WSA erro
On Jul 21 11:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 20 20:46, Kai Tietz wrote:
> > 2012/7/20 Ozkan Sezer :
> > > On 7/20/12, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >> Oh, I forgot something else. All other EAI_xxx values are defined
> > >> in terms of WSA error values. The WSA error values are d
On Jul 21 13:04, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen a lot of chatter/patches going into MinGW-w64 for Cygwin support,
> which is great, as I've noticed a lot of small inconsistencies and code
> clarity issues are being fixed.
>
> What I would like to know is if I could build a working Cyg
