On Jul 21 11:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 20 20:46, Kai Tietz wrote: > > 2012/7/20 Ozkan Sezer <seze...@gmail.com>: > > > On 7/20/12, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> Oh, I forgot something else. All other EAI_xxx values are defined > > >> in terms of WSA error values. The WSA error values are defined as > > >> int values anyway, see psdk_inc/_wsa_errnos.h. So EAI_NODATA is the > > >> only one defined as long value right now. > > > > > > Corinna's arguments make sense to me. I'm OK with whatever will > > > be the final decision. > > > > So, patch is ok. > > Thanks, applied. > > On second thought, I wonder why EAI_NODATA is the only definition > which is not based on the equivalent WSA value. Shouldn't this > > #define EAI_NODATA WSANO_DATA > > be better?
Ping? Corinna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
