On 07/27/2017 03:24 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 27/07/17 01:48, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Hi guys,
I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent
comments on other parts.
More generally:
- I wonder if some intermediate patches can break Mesa, would be nice
to avoid that (es
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> On 27/07/17 04:53, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>> On July 26, 2017 8:48:18 AM Samuel Pitoiset
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent comments
>>> on other parts.
>>>
>>> More generally:
On 27/07/17 01:48, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Hi guys,
I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent comments
on other parts.
More generally:
- I wonder if some intermediate patches can break Mesa, would be nice to
avoid that (especially for bisecting) Can you double check?
E
On 27/07/17 04:53, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On July 26, 2017 8:48:18 AM Samuel Pitoiset
wrote:
Hi guys,
I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent comments
on other parts.
More generally:
- I wonder if some intermediate patches can break Mesa, would be nice to
avoid that (
On July 26, 2017 8:48:18 AM Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Hi guys,
I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent comments
on other parts.
More generally:
- I wonder if some intermediate patches can break Mesa, would be nice to
avoid that (especially for bisecting) Can you double ch
Hi guys,
I didn't review the radeonsi and radv patches, but I have sent comments
on other parts.
More generally:
- I wonder if some intermediate patches can break Mesa, would be nice to
avoid that (especially for bisecting) Can you double check?
- I don't see any piglit tests... or did I m
Hi all,
Andres is not around at the moment so as well are reviewing the
remaining patches I've rebased and added all Marek's suggestions.
I've also made a few minor changes (see commit messages) and
reworked some of the patches to reduce code churn.
I thought I'd send it out one last time to see
