On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan
wrote:
>
>> Patchset looks reasonable to me, from a quick look. Testing a22x
>> isn't so easy without resurrecting an ancient downstream kernel for
>> old snadragon devices, so I think it is ok to ignore that. If the
>
> Do you mean:
>
>
> Patchset looks reasonable to me, from a quick look. Testing a22x
> isn't so easy without resurrecting an ancient downstream kernel for
> old snadragon devices, so I think it is ok to ignore that. If the
Do you mean:
- try to keep supporting a22x on best-effort basis by providing fallback
b
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan
wrote:
> While working on a205 support for i.MX51/53, I've also written some patches
> that are not specific to a20x but should apply to the whole a2xx range.
>
> As I'm figuring out how to handle backward compatibility to other a2xx, I
> t
While working on a205 support for i.MX51/53, I've also written some patches
that are not specific to a20x but should apply to the whole a2xx range.
As I'm figuring out how to handle backward compatibility to other a2xx, I
think it makes sense to send these upstream already to reduce the patch stac
