> Patchset looks reasonable to me, from a quick look. Testing a22x > isn't so easy without resurrecting an ancient downstream kernel for > old snadragon devices, so I think it is ok to ignore that. If the
Do you mean: - try to keep supporting a22x on best-effort basis by providing fallback behavior where uncertain, or - ignore a22x completely and evolve the driver to a20x? > rnndb bits are merged already, then: I'd swear those bits were merged in rnndb, but they aren't! So the commit id in 1/8 was wrong all the time. Pushed as: b8fb7978e7ae106d0d11d0b238ab2ba2d4dd9d43. > Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]> Thanks! Regards, Wladimir _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
