On Dec 17, 2014 7:43 AM, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> >>
> >> As a future cleanup, would it be worth getting rid of fddx and fddy
> >> entirely and just generating the correc
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>
>> As a future cleanup, would it be worth getting rid of fddx and fddy
>> entirely and just generating the correct variant based on the
>> glHint/drirc configuration?
>
>
> Nope.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>
> As a future cleanup, would it be worth getting rid of fddx and fddy
> entirely and just generating the correct variant based on the
> glHint/drirc configuration?
>
Nope. https://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ARB/derivative_control.txt
As a future cleanup, would it be worth getting rid of fddx and fddy
entirely and just generating the correct variant based on the
glHint/drirc configuration?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> ---
> src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>
---
src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h
index bee4bd1..9a7a2ab 100644
--- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h
+++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.h
@@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ UNOP(fcos_reduced, nir_type_float)
/*
