On Monday, September 21, 2015 09:24:17 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
> > On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:26:04 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >> Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
> >> nir_lower_samplers is n
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:26:04 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
>>> nir_lower_samplers is now using nir_b
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:26:04 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
>> nir_lower_samplers is now using nir_builder, and nir_lower_samplers is in
>> C++, this breaks the
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:26:04 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
>> nir_lower_samplers is now using nir_builder, and nir_lower_samplers is in
>> C++, this breaks the
On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:26:04 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
> nir_lower_samplers is now using nir_builder, and nir_lower_samplers is in
> C++, this breaks the build on some compilers. Aparently, GCC 5 allows it
> in some
Designated initializers are not allowed in C++ (not even C++11). Since
nir_lower_samplers is now using nir_builder, and nir_lower_samplers is in
C++, this breaks the build on some compilers. Aparently, GCC 5 allows it
in some limited extent because mesa still builds on my system without this
patc