Quoting Jon Turney (2017-11-14 04:05:21)
> On 13/11/2017 17:41, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > I thought I'd fixed this already,
> > Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker
>
> This workaround is already in place for dep_xxf86vm.
>
> I took a brief look, and didn't see anywhere the same problem could
> occur with any
On 13/11/2017 17:41, Dylan Baker wrote:
I thought I'd fixed this already,
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker
This workaround is already in place for dep_xxf86vm.
I took a brief look, and didn't see anywhere the same problem could
occur with any of the other uses of [] for a dependency.
Quoting Jon
I thought I'd fixed this already,
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker
Quoting Jon Turney (2017-11-13 02:28:27)
> It's ok to use an empty list for dependencies:, but it's not ok to try to
> use the found() method of it.
>
> See also https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2324
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Tur
On Monday, 2017-11-13 10:28:27 +, Jon Turney wrote:
> It's ok to use an empty list for dependencies:, but it's not ok to try to
> use the found() method of it.
>
> See also https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2324
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Turney
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom
> ---
> m
It's ok to use an empty list for dependencies:, but it's not ok to try to
use the found() method of it.
See also https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2324
Signed-off-by: Jon Turney
---
meson.build | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.buil
