On 13/11/2017 17:41, Dylan Baker wrote:
I thought I'd fixed this already,
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
This workaround is already in place for dep_xxf86vm.
I took a brief look, and didn't see anywhere the same problem could
occur with any of the other uses of [] for a dependency.
Quoting Jon Turney (2017-11-13 02:28:27)
It's ok to use an empty list for dependencies:, but it's not ok to try to
use the found() method of it.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
