-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2011 01:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
> starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
>
> This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
> - glsl-fs-loop-redundant-cond
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Strangely, glsl-vs-vec4-indexing-temp-dst-inloop already passes on i965.
> I'm not sure why it would work on i965 but not r300 if the bug is in the
> common code. But it's quite possible.
Could the reason be that, unlike i965 (guess), i
On 03/27/2011 01:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
- glsl-fs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-vec4
Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
- glsl-fs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-vec4-indexing-temp-dst-in-loop
NOTE: This is a ca