On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>wrote:
> Strangely, glsl-vs-vec4-indexing-temp-dst-inloop already passes on i965. > I'm not sure why it would work on i965 but not r300 if the bug is in the > common code. But it's quite possible. Could the reason be that, unlike i965 (guess), indirect addressing is lowered for r300? Marek
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
