[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2019-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 GitLab Migration User changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2018-04-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 Timothy Arceri changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Other |Drivers/Gallium/llvmpipe -- You are re

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2016-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 Kenneth Graunke changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|79706 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freed

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2015-06-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #10 from José Fonseca --- On me Mesa DRI Intel(R) Haswell Mobile I actually get the reverse problem: $ ./bin/gl-1.4-polygon-offset -auto Actual MRD is too large (may waste depth-buffer range) Ideal MRD at near plane is 5.96

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2015-06-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #9 from Vinson Lee --- mesa: 4d35eef326e49cc8da50879d30a1c5088d4775e1 (master 10.7.0-devel) This regression is still present on llvmpipe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2014-11-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #8 from José Fonseca --- Yes, I suspect that ideal MRD at near plane may never go below 2, because of the the "near_1_far_infinity" perspective transformation applied. We could experiment whether an orthogonal transformation would al

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #7 from Roland Scheidegger --- (In reply to Laura Ekstrand from comment #6) > I recently ported this test from Glean to Piglit, and I took another look at > it just now. From my understanding, I think the logic of the test is > corre

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #6 from Laura Ekstrand --- I recently ported this test from Glean to Piglit, and I took another look at it just now. From my understanding, I think the logic of the test is correct, but perhaps you are correct that the implementation

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #5 from Roland Scheidegger --- (In reply to José Fonseca from comment #4) > This test was renamed, but the issue is still there: > > $ ./bin/gl-1.4-polygon-offset -auto > Actual MRD is too small (may cause incorrect results) >

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 71199] [llvmpipe] piglit gl-1.4-polygon-offset regression

2014-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 José Fonseca changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[llvmpipe] piglit glean |[llvmpipe] piglit |poly