---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
index 1311db9..be731a0 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
@@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ TODO
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
index 69b735c..1311db9 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/drirc
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ TODO
Not having push access rights, I hope this fix gets merged soon.
Hopefully a stable release candidate as well.
Thanks,
Petr
On 12.11.2013 00:32, Brian Paul wrote:
On 11/11/2013 04:19 PM, Petr Sebor wrote:
Otherwise, the function would enable generic vertex attributes 0 and
1 of the
array
, leading to NULL
pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Petr Sebor
---
This version is really much better for the reasons both you and Ian mentioned.
And... works for me! Thanks!
Petr
---
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa
dereference.
Signed-off-by: Petr Sebor
---
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c b/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c
index aa50dde..06e3e3c 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c
On 10.8.2011 0:13, Ian Romanick wrote:
Two words: contributory infringement. The Mesa code would be doing
something that enables something else to infringe. No distro will ship
it because it makes them liable. Don't look for logic or reason or
sense in the legal system. You won't find it.
wanted to pay for that part at the given
time. It worked well.
Regards,
Petr
--
Petr Sebor / SCS Software [ http://www.scssoft.com ]
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On 20.3.2011 22:21, Patrick Baggett wrote:
Offhand, anyone know when these patents expire?
Patrick
If the following is right:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_of_patent_in_the_United_States
then given S3TC patent
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=5956431&KC=&FT=E
On 20.3.2011 20:23, Mathias Gottschlag wrote:
Argh, meant to reply to list.
If this nvidia library has a s3tc patent license, cannot this be used
as a starting point, as done with the current dxt library? Unmodified,
as an external binary? Wouldn't that circumvent the whole issue as you
do n
le to compress
them them on the fly. Otherwise the EXT_tc_s3tc is no go.
This is (I believe) the difference that matters.
Petr
--
Petr Sebor / SCS Software [ http://www.scssoft.com ]
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
roblem, because they were
actually implementing
the patented stuff.
This is crazy.
I think this is a dead end since there is no chance of ever getting out
of this FUD spiral.
Petr
--
Petr Sebor / SCS Software [ http://www.scssoft.com ]
___
On 20.3.2011 1:40, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 20 March 2011 00:42, Petr Sebor wrote:
And this is not an undocumented hack. ARB_texture_compression explicitly
defines mechanisms to work with 'unknown' formats providing a safe
passthrough.
Thats what glCompressedTexImage actually is f
On 19.3.2011 16:06, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 19 March 2011 12:24, Petr Sebor wrote:
But just because we are all 'used to' simply check for the existence
of the GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc doesn't mean we really want to use it
at all.
Many of the current applications
we just
had to use it to get S3TC).
Regards,
Petr
--
Petr Sebor / SCS Software [ http://www.scssoft.com ]
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On 18.3.2011 16:50, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 18 March 2011 14:19, Petr Sebor wrote:
I know that at least our games would benefit from this feature immediately,
but I guess Wine people might welcome this as well, where 'benefit' means -
do not have to
painfully install the external D
benefit from this feature immediately,
but I guess Wine people might welcome this as well, where 'benefit'
means - do not have to
painfully install the external DXT library, which is very likely not
needed at all.
What are your opinions? It it something that might be possi
16 matches
Mail list logo