Re: [Mailman-Users] a silly question :-)

On 02/15/2018 09:56 AM, Dr. Alberto Barengols wrote: > A very silly question: In the configuration web page, where is the > variable to configure the automatic reminder of the subscription to a > list? This is complex. In order for monthly reminders to be sent at all, the installation must be

Re: [Mailman-Users] A rant on parsing RFCs

Ruben Safir writes: > RFCs are a record of a process. Partially true. The process almost invariably leaves its trace in the text, and (as in any committee work) many compromises are inexplicable without reference to the process. But the text of an RFC is a specification, not a narrative. > U

Re: [Mailman-Users] A rant on parsing RFCs

On 10/23/2017 12:57 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users writes: > > > RFC 6377 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) and Mailing Lists, > > disagrees with you. (RFC 6377 is also currently known as BCP 167.) > > tl;dr version: RFC 5598 (non-normative but authoritative

Re: [Mailman-Users] a way for mods to review rejection messages?

On 01/23/2017 11:38 AM, Matt Morgan wrote: > > I can see the "Refused posting:" message text in logs/vette, but that takes > logging in, grepping etc., and of course I can see everything from every > list in there. Is there somewhere that the mods for each list can see prior > moderation actions o

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick question about slicing outgoing qrunner

Hi Mark, Thanks for the information. I plan on looking at the MTA. Unfortunately, when we migrated Mailman to a new server, I don't have the same abilities to effect changes as I did on the old server. The server is now managed by a different group and I just run an "application" on their s

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick question about slicing outgoing qrunner

On 09/08/2016 11:51 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Sep 08, 2016, at 08:15 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > >>> ('OutgoingRunner', 3), # outgoing messages to the smtpd (change to three >>> '3' queues) > > Slices must be a power of 2. As I wrote in my reply at

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick question about slicing outgoing qrunner

On Sep 08, 2016, at 08:15 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> ('OutgoingRunner', 3), # outgoing messages to the smtpd (change to three >> '3' queues) Slices must be a power of 2. Cheers, -Barry -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick question about slicing outgoing qrunner

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > Hello all, > > I have read the archives regarding slicing the qrunner queues. Mailman here > runs on a single system (virtual) along with the local MTA and web server. > Our outgoing queue recently got bogged down. I would like to increase the >

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick question about slicing outgoing qrunner

On 09/07/2016 02:54 PM, Chris Nulk wrote: > > I have read the archives regarding slicing the qrunner queues. Mailman > here runs on a single system (virtual) along with the local MTA and web > server. Our outgoing queue recently got bogged down. I would like to > increase the number of queues fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On 27/06/2014 00:54, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Rousell writes: > > > On 26/06/2014 09:22, Malcolm Austen wrote: > > > (I note that neither yahoo.co.uk nor aol.co.uk have published a DMARC > > > policy.) > > > > As a relevant aside, AOL in the UK was sold to TalkTalk a couple of > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

Mark Rousell writes: > On 26/06/2014 09:22, Malcolm Austen wrote: > > (I note that neither yahoo.co.uk nor aol.co.uk have published a DMARC > > policy.) > > As a relevant aside, AOL in the UK was sold to TalkTalk a couple of > years ago so is independent of AOL in the USA. yahoo.com says t

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On 26/06/2014 09:22, Malcolm Austen wrote: > (I note that neither yahoo.co.uk nor aol.co.uk have published a DMARC > policy.) As a relevant aside, AOL in the UK was sold to TalkTalk a couple of years ago so is independent of AOL in the USA. I note that the aol.co.uk domain is still owned by AOL I

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On 06/26/2014 01:22 AM, Malcolm Austen wrote: > > Thanks Mark. For the time being I have removed AOL and Yahoo from that > spam filter and marked all such addresses as 'moderated'. I'm guessing > though that allowing them through would still escape the DMARC munging - > so I've told the list that

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On 06/25/2014 08:11 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > I think for this reason DMARC checking should come before spam > detection, or be done as part of SpamDetect rather than moderation. > If dmarc_moderation_action is reject/discard, let's not waste any > further CPU cycles or queue space, let a

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:50:51 +0100, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Malcolm Austen writes: > I did (before I had 2.1.18-1 available) toy with setting it high (c.9 or > 10) and setting bounce_info_stale_after down to 1 so that I could let > aol/yahoo posts out in a burst on one day and then

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

Malcolm Austen writes: > I did (before I had 2.1.18-1 available) toy with setting it high (c.9 or > 10) and setting bounce_info_stale_after down to 1 so that I could let > aol/yahoo posts out in a burst on one day and then hold them for a couple > of days to clear the bounce scores. Of

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:32:23 +0100, Mark Sapiro wrote: On 06/25/2014 02:41 PM, Malcolm Austen wrote: I won't call this a bug but I think it's an issue :-) It is an issue. I too am not sure whether it is a bug, but I think we need to do something about it. More below ... Thanks Mark. For th

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

Mark Sapiro writes: > That is exactly what happened. header_filter_rules is processed by > SpamDetect which is the first handler in the pipeline. I see why Barry created Chains of Rules for MM3. This is messy. I think for this reason DMARC checking should come before spam detection, or be don

Re: [Mailman-Users] A DMARC munging issue ... ?

On 06/25/2014 02:41 PM, Malcolm Austen wrote: > I won't call this a bug but I think it's an issue :-) It is an issue. I too am not sure whether it is a bug, but I think we need to do something about it. More below ... > I have (via the GUI sender filters) dmarc_moderation_action set to > 'munge

Re: [Mailman-Users] A word to the wise: spam-checking and RFC conformance

On my server, it was being instead by spamassassin and was then visible in each message handled by Mailman. The “content-preview” in the header is easily removed in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Matthew On May 14, 2014, at 02:52 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Hi all, > > I just discove

Re: [Mailman-Users] A quick couple of questions regarding "From", "Sender" and Gmail

Never mind, I found everything I needed. On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 15:41 -0600, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > I'm trying to reply to a comment from a Mailman list subscriber on a > list I manage, and have a couple of questions which someone might be > able to answer quickly, or post me a link, much faster

Re: [Mailman-Users] A question about IncomingRunner

METU E-List Admin wrote: > >We are using Mailman 2.1.13 from Debian repositories (which is the >latest version for squeeze). We are facing late mail delivery problems >and after some research, we think we managed to overcome these problems >by changing some configuration options. I don't know

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On 2012-07-28 12:38 PM, William Yardley wrote: Even if it's not primarily intended for that purpose, Mailman is used extensively as (and can be configured as) an announcement list, vs. a traditional discussion list. In that context (where none of the members can post, or learn the email address

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:39:06PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:51:51 -0400 "Brian Canty" wrote: > > > Hello - I was wondering if anyone has a way to provide subscribers a > > simple and easy way to unsubscribe from a mailing list. I do not > What's wrong with the current

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On 6/29/2012 5:39 PM, Robert Braver wrote: > > If there's anything in the content of the list messages that could > be construed as an advertisement, the failure to have a one-click > (or one email) unsubscribe is a violation of federal law (CAN-SPAM > Act) and the FTC regulations promulgated ther

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On Friday, June 29, 2012, 12:39:06 PM, Brad Rogers wrote: BR> What's wrong with the current challenge and response method? Stops BR> people from maliciously (un)subscribing others. If there's anything in the content of the list messages that could be construed as an advertisement, the failure to

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

David wrote: > >We usually see these one-click unsubscribe buttons on marketing newsletters >and similar correspondence, but they don't seem to be a good option for a >mailing list. (At least, I haven't figured out how to make it work in a way >that would fit with the needs of a mailing list.) Th

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:51:51 -0400 "Brian Canty" wrote: Hello Brian, >Hello - I was wondering if anyone has a way to provide subscribers a >simple and easy way to unsubscribe from a mailing list. I do not What's wrong with the current challenge and response method? Stops people from malicious

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dave Dewey wrote: > > Quoting Brian Canty (bca...@apsa.org): > > > Hello - I was wondering if anyone has a way to provide subscribers a > > simple and easy way to unsubscribe from a mailing list. I do not > > provide passwords, so I was wondering if there is a si

Re: [Mailman-Users] A simple unsubscribe

Quoting Brian Canty (bca...@apsa.org): > Hello - I was wondering if anyone has a way to provide subscribers a > simple and easy way to unsubscribe from a mailing list. I do not > provide passwords, so I was wondering if there is a simple enter your > email address box that I can include on a lin

Re: [Mailman-Users] A list is rejected by email server after migration

On 2/29/2012 11:21 AM, Frank Bell wrote: All, within the last ten minutes my linux sysadmin discovered that the mailman-aliases file at /etc/mail did not for some reason contain one or two entries. (yes after migration I ran genaliases ) Solution was: He brought the old mailman-aliases from th

Re: [Mailman-Users] A list is rejected by email server after migration

All, within the last ten minutes my linux sysadmin discovered that the mailman-aliases file at /etc/mail did not for some reason contain one or two entries. (yes after migration I ran genaliases ) Solution was: He brought the old mailman-aliases from the old server, copied the missing entries i

Re: [Mailman-Users] A list is rejected by email server after migration

Frank Bell wrote: > >After an upgrade last night all our lists can send email except one. >It is rejected by the smtp server it says that address does not exist. >The mailman page for the list exists, the mbox file exists >Any thoughts on what went wrong and how to fix it? (just happens to be >the

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few questions about mailman 2.1.14 install onDreamhost

On 1/4/2012 6:05 PM, hk wrote: > > Now I'm wondering . . . how does one export a mailman user list to > mass-add to another list? See the FAQ at . -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. D

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few questions about mailman 2.1.14 install onDreamhost

Thanks again for these answers. Now I'm wondering . . . how does one export a mailman user list to mass-add to another list? I've looked everywhere, don't see a way. This is in Mailman 2.1.11 if that matters. Thanks, Howard, Chicago Mark Sapiro wrote: hk wrote: I'm considering the move of a

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few questions about mailman 2.1.14 install onDreamhost

hk wrote: >I'm considering the move of a longstanding discussion list with 600+ >members from L-Soft Listserv (hosted at a university) to Mailman on >Dreamhost (v2.1.14.) > >There are a few management features I've really grown to like from >hosting other lists -- I was hoping if someone can te

Re: [Mailman-Users] A dumb first question

Laurie Lee wrote: >Thank you for the info. I've looked through the options available to me as a >list owner and clearly I have no direct way of changing the "set" outcome. >As you say this is an "installation-wide setting". > >My next question: Is there a simple way that I can determine what this

Re: [Mailman-Users] A dumb first question

Cpanel Ver 11 site/hosting? Cheers 8^) Laurie Lee -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Friday, 30 September 2011 4:16 AM To: Laurie Lee; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] A dumb first question Laurie Lee wrote: >If I create a 80

Re: [Mailman-Users] A dumb first question

Laurie Lee wrote: >Greetings, >My first question which may seem dumb for those of you with lots of >experience. >If I create a 800 member Mailman list and send a single message to it, what >will happen if the list is on a Cpanel site with mail send restrictions of >200 messages per hour? It dep

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about archiving.

Michael Capelle wrote: >Hello. >is there a way to search by topic in mailman? >if not, will this be implemented? See the FAQ at for information about making archives searchable. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californi

Re: [Mailman-Users] a handful of issues

On 6/2/11 10:48 AM, Patrick Cox wrote: > 1. I've just received an email from a list member who says about 75% of > posts from our list appear in her email without any texts! She received a > subject line and can see the poster's name, but the email is empty! She uses > Mail for Mac If others see

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

yahoo wrote: > >How do I filter out the "Part 1.2" leftovers? These are ASCII and seem to >be the sig divider, and the sig contents. They are left on messages >relieved of other attachments. If the final message delivered from the list is a multipart message with just two parts and those parts

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

v 2.1.9 b) /dev/null the attachments, both in delivery and archives. filter_content - Yes filter_mime_types - empty pass_mime_types - multipart message/rfc822 (allows plain text and converted HTML from attached messages. Remove to filter attached messages) text/pl

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

On 1/3/11 10:34 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Maybe it's 2.1.13? Or maybe it's 2.1.9 which is the RedHat el5 RPM version. My bad; that it is... I'll add a comment. FAQ 1.8 is confusing because it does not make it clear what comments relate to 2.0, and what to 2.1. Further, it's discussing both H

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

On 1/3/2011 6:28 PM, yahoo wrote: > On 1/3/11 2:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> filter_content - Yes >> filter_mime_types - empty >> pass_mime_types - >>multipart >>message/rfc822 (allows plain text and converted HTML from attached >>messages. Remove to filter attached mes

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

On 1/3/11 2:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: I've been reading the FAQ's etc and asking local advice; but I must be doing something stoopid. MM2.1.3 under Linux, 2.6.18-164.el5 2.1.3? This is quite old. Current is 2.1.14. I'll ask the local maintainer to upgrade. Ooops, he says there's no RPM

Re: [Mailman-Users] A basic filtering MIME question

yahoo wrote: >I've been reading the FAQ's etc and asking local advice; but I must be >doing something stoopid. > >MM2.1.3 under Linux, 2.6.18-164.el5 2.1.3? This is quite old. Current is 2.1.14. >My goal is: > >a) Accept text/MIME/HTML message bodies, but deliver as text to subscribers >& ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] A rare moment

Mark> With 60 or so lists and 12,000+ subscribers around the Mark> globe it is easy to get behind. I've seen 10,000 or more Mark> held messages at times. Today, though: Mark> Mark> autox /local/mailman/teamnet/data 131 :: ls held* Mark> ls: No match. Mark, That'

Re: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more members??

On 9/21/2010 7:07 PM, Ricky Lim wrote: > > In addition we discovered that in /var/log/mailman/vette , the message is > being discardrd by moderate. > > Sep 21 17:10:52 2010 (7606) Message discarded by Moderate, msgid: > <4c98769d.80...@ntt.com.sg> This log message does not exist in standard G

Re: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more members??

com.sg] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:05 AM To: 'Mark Sapiro'; 'mailman-users@python.org' Cc: 'Ong Swee Hua' Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more members?? Hi Mark Thanks for the emails. In /var/log

Re: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more members??

r) -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:45 PM To: Ricky Lim; mailman-users@python.org Cc: 'Ong Swee Hua' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more member

Re: [Mailman-Users] A particular mailing list cant send out emails ifhave 2000 or more members??

Ricky Lim wrote: > >Just wondering if anyone have met with such situation whereby a mailing list >have 2000 or more members and it cant send out emails?? > > > >I have tried to increase postfix sending recipient (smtpd_recipient_limit and >smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to 5000 each) , but sti

Re: [Mailman-Users] a user turns on his moderation flag?

Stanislaw Findeisen wrote: >Is it possible for an ordinary list subscriber to change (turn on) his >own moderation flag? If it were possible for anyone without the list admin or site admin password or (command shell) write access to the Mailman installation to set a user's "mod" flag, even his ow

Re: [Mailman-Users] A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Heather Williams wrote: >I have a client that uses your software. One of their members on their >list serve is getting this error message in his emails from the list >serve and is unable to open the attachments. No other member is getting >this. Can you please help me to resolve this issue for the

Re: [Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

On Oct 12, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Barry Warsaw writes: Perhaps a good place to start is to write up a draft on wiki.list.org? Will do. Is there a good place to put it? I would start by putting it under Initiatives here: http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Home But rea

Re: [Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

Barry Warsaw writes: > Perhaps a good place to start is to write up a draft on > wiki.list.org? Will do. Is there a good place to put it? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-u

Re: [Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists, not users. As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be prefixed "List-". As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have no idea how much w

Re: [Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

Barry Warsaw writes: > [Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers > since it was spelled "mailman-de...@python.org" -BAW] Thanks. > In general, I like Stephen's proposal as a way to help reduce the > ambiguity in this very common workflow. I'll bikeshed on this

Re: [Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

[Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers since it was spelled "mailman-de...@python.org" -BAW] On Oct 10, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: 2. A formal proposal of a new header field, Responses-To, whose sole purpose is to allow mailing lists conform

Re: [Mailman-Users] A question on undeliverables

Brian Carpenter wrote: > >I have a client who is not using Mailman's automatic bounce processing. >However he wants to be able to receive any undeliverable notification that >his list encounters when a post is sent to it so he can manually remove the >trouble e-mail account himself. Is there a way

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few configuration questions

Grant Taylor > >I don't think you will need and -text with >Mailman as it has the ability to convert HTML to plain text its self. >People just need to choose their preference. Converting HTML to plain text is done as part of content filtering and it is a list option. It is not something indiv

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few configuration questions

Jeff Grossman wrote: > >1. The Fishads and Fishads-Text are identical lists except one is >sent using HTML and the other is sent in plain text. There is really no >reason for a user to be subscribed to both lists. Is it possible for me >to set up Mailman so an e-mail address can only be on o

Re: [Mailman-Users] A few configuration questions

On 02/12/09 08:22, Jeff Grossman wrote: 1. The Fishads and Fishads-Text are identical lists except one is sent using HTML and the other is sent in plain text. There is really no reason for a user to be subscribed to both lists. Is it possible for me to set up Mailman so an e-mail address can

Re: [Mailman-Users] A lot of unsubscribes

Closer examination has revealed that most if not all of these unsubscriptions are valid. The 'cron' explanation appears correct, because when I upgraded, I also found that the password reminders were suddenly being sent out, which they had not before. Looking at crontab, I found the cron job to

Re: [Mailman-Users] A lot of unsubscribes

Allan Hansen wrote: > >I recently updated my server from Mac OS X 10.4 to 10.5, with the attendant >upgrade >of Mailman. > >Following that, the server suddenly unsubscribed some 300 subscribers from >various >lists. Is that to be expected or should I resubscribe them? It's not "expected", but i

Re: [Mailman-Users] A cluster issue I didn't find in the faq, or on google

On Sat, 17 May 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote: For this and probably other reasons, you want VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = Off Aha!!! That does, indeed do exactly what I want in mm_cfg.py. See . I did some searches in the faq; shou

Re: [Mailman-Users] A cluster issue I didn't find in the faq, or on google

Richard Nelson wrote: > >* on all but the original machine, http:///cgi-bin/(listinfo|admin)/ > says there are *no* public lists (when in fact there are several) >and > on the original machine, http:///cgi-bin/(listinfo|admin)/ > shows the full list The default setting VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW =

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

liste yoneticisi wrote: > >Actually I just want a vissible message for deleted/filtered attachments. Actually, given the current architecture of content filtering, this turns out to be not at all easy to do in any reasonable way. About the best that could be done without too much difficulty is co

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote: Brad Knowles wrote: >On 3/7/08, Mark Sapiro quoted liste yoneticisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>Is there a patch that giving information for filtered extension. >>> >>> I mean i am filtering *.mpg for example. >>> If someone sends an attachment with mpg exte

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

Brad Knowles wrote: >On 3/7/08, Mark Sapiro quoted liste yoneticisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>Is there a patch that giving information for filtered extension. >>> >>> I mean i am filtering *.mpg for example. >>> If someone sends an attachment with mpg extension, e-mail is delivered >>> without

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

On 3/7/08, Mark Sapiro quoted liste yoneticisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>Is there a patch that giving information for filtered extension. >> >> I mean i am filtering *.mpg for example. >> If someone sends an attachment with mpg extension, e-mail is delivered >> without attachment and without any i

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

liste yoneticisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:54:17 +0200 (WET) To: Mailman Users ML > >Hi; > >Is there a patch that giving information for filtered extension. > >I mean i am filtering *.mpg for example. >If someone sends an attachment with mpg extension, e-mail is deliver

Re: [Mailman-Users] A small problem when migrating a mailman list

AlxFrag wrote: >i've tried ./withlist -l -r fix_url mylist -urlhost=mydomain but i >still can't see the mylist appear in listiinfo. Is the list's advertised attribute (under Privacy options... in the web admin interface) set to Yes? If so, do bin/dumpdb lists/mylist/config.pck | grep \'web

Re: [Mailman-Users] A small problem when migrating a mailman list

Mark Sapiro wrote: > AlxFrag wrote: > >> List works ok in the new mail server. The problem is that i cant see it >> in http://mydomain/mailman/admin. >> > > > See > > > i've tried ./withlist -l -r fix_url mylist -ur

Re: [Mailman-Users] A small problem when migrating a mailman list

AlxFrag wrote: > >List works ok in the new mail server. The problem is that i cant see it >in http://mydomain/mailman/admin. See -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area,

Re: [Mailman-Users] A question about Non-member filters

Barry Finkel wrote: > >I do not know which test comes first - require_explicit_destination or >accept_these_nonmembers. In any case, the explicit destination check >applies to all postings. Assuming you haven't changed the GLOBAL_PIPELINE order: mm_cfg.KNOWN_SPAMMERS and header_filter_rules ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] A question about Non-member filters

Jim Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >All, > I have a question on a problem that one of my list admins is seeing. >We have a non-member filter setup for a specific email address that is >allowed to post to a particular list. When the list member attempts to >send to the list the list admin rec

Re: [Mailman-Users] a question about content-filtering

liste yoneticisi wrote: > >pass_filename_extensions = """doc >xls >xml >xlw >ppt >pps >pdf >php >gz >gif >jpg >jpeg >bmp >png >htm >html >txt >rtf >rar >zip""" > >But i have a problem, if someone sends a document with file name qwe.JPG >mailman doesn't send the attachment. >I couldn't add the Capit

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Brad Knowles wrote: > There's no way we can possibly track down every single developer on > every single platform that is creating localized patches for Mailman > on their platform. The only way this process can possibly work is > if they use our mechanisms to send their patches to us. FWIW, I wa

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/26/07, Todd Zullinger wrote: > AFAICS, The Debian patches to Mailman are here: > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mailman/trunk/debian/patches/ And our development page on SourceForge is at , although internally all the new work is being maintaine

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/26/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > That's strange. > One of the Debian policicy is the strict contact between the package > maintainer and the upstream software authors. See my previous message on this thread. > The Debian maintainer(s) of Mailman can be easily found at: > http://packages.

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Brad Knowles ha scritto: > On 8/25/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > >> Do the debian maintainer of Mailman frequent this mailing list? > > Not so far as I know. > > Improved contact between our project and the other projects which take > our code and create binary packages is one thing that we woul

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

(Disclaimer: I'm not a Debian maintainer or user) Brad Knowles wrote: > On 8/25/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > >> Do the debian maintainer of Mailman frequent this mailing list? > > Not so far as I know. > > Improved contact between our project and the other projects which > take our code and cr

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/25/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > Do the debian maintainer of Mailman frequent this mailing list? Not so far as I know. Improved contact between our project and the other projects which take our code and create binary packages is one thing that we would like to work on, but of course the tw

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Barry Finkel ha scritto: > [...] >> Sorry for the late response. >> I think that the lack of documentation in the code can be considered a bug. > > Then I would have to file a bug report on almost all of the > Debian/Ubuntu patches to Mailman. I looked at them all, and I discarded > most. I kept

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Barry Finkel ha scritto: >> [...] > >> The patches were, for the most part, >>> undocumented, so I had no idea exactly what they did. Nor did I know >>> if they would fit into the 2.1.9 source, as some of the patches were >>> based on pre-2.1.5 code. >> >> Manlio Perillo replied: >>> This was une

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Barry Finkel ha scritto: > [...] > The patches were, for the most part, >> undocumented, so I had no idea exactly what they did. Nor did I know >> if they would fit into the 2.1.9 source, as some of the patches were >> based on pre-2.1.5 code. > > Manlio Perillo replied: >> This was unexpected!

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Manlio Perillo >Mark Sapiro ha scritto: >> >> Is Mailman's cron/gate_news being run every five minutes from Mailman's >> crontab? >> > >Thanks: the cron tab entry is still commented. >However I think that this should be documented in the admnistrative web >interface. The istallation of the c

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Mark Sapiro ha scritto: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Manlio Perillo wrote: >> 1) The messages from the newsgroup are not sent on the mailing list. >> I don't know why, there is nothing in the error log > > > Is Mailman's cron/gate_news being run every five minutes fr

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manlio Perillo wrote: > > 1) The messages from the newsgroup are not sent on the mailing list. > I don't know why, there is nothing in the error log Is Mailman's cron/gate_news being run every five minutes from Mailman's crontab? If so, it migh

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Barry Finkel ha scritto: > Brad Knowles wrote in reply to a posting: > >> And I'm not at all convinced that "security problems are not a >> problem, with Debian" or any other OS, for that matter. Especially >> not with an old binary package that is based on old code that is >> known to have se

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Barry Finkel ha scritto: > Brad Knowles wrote in reply to a posting: > >> And I'm not at all convinced that "security problems are not a >> problem, with Debian" or any other OS, for that matter. Especially >> not with an old binary package that is based on old code that is >> known to have se

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Brad Knowles wrote in reply to a posting: >And I'm not at all convinced that "security problems are not a >problem, with Debian" or any other OS, for that matter. Especially >not with an old binary package that is based on old code that is >known to have security flaws. When I was comparing t

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/7/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > Well, having a pre-built packages systems has also some benefits. True enough, and where it makes sense we do make wide use of binary packages for other things on the system. > The Debian Secutiry team still supports Debian Sarge. > And in theory, if a secu

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Brad Knowles ha scritto: > On 8/7/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > >> Mailman runs on a Debian Sarge server, so this can be a problem without >> an upgrade to Etch (but security problems are not a problem, with >> Debian). > > You could always install Mailman from source on that system, or you may

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/7/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > Mailman runs on a Debian Sarge server, so this can be a problem without > an upgrade to Etch (but security problems are not a problem, with Debian). You could always install Mailman from source on that system, or you may be able to find a pre-built package th

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

Brad Knowles ha scritto: > On 8/6/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > >> I'm using Mailman 2.1.5. > > BTW, the most recent version of Mailman is 2.1.9, which has a number of > new features and some fixes for certain security holes. I'd strongly > encourage you to upgrade. > Mailman runs on a Debian

Re: [Mailman-Users] a few questions about the NNTP gateway

On 8/6/07, Manlio Perillo wrote: > I'm using Mailman 2.1.5. BTW, the most recent version of Mailman is 2.1.9, which has a number of new features and some fixes for certain security holes. I'd strongly encourage you to upgrade. > I have enabled the NNTP Gateway but there are some problems. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] a bug found in 2.1.9

Scott Berry wrote: > >Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of >traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but >the webmaster >can find this information in the Mailman error logs. > >I am using Fedora and could not find any erros. Try /va

Re: [Mailman-Users] a bug found in 2.1.9

* Scott Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello there list, > > I am a new person using mailman and it looks like a bug is prevalent in > 2.1.9. Here is what I got off the web page: > > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > We're sorry, we hit a bug! > > Please inform

  1   2   3   >