;
> --
> From: tbergham...@google.com
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:23:41 +
>
> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Add support for OCaml native debugging
> To: e.bouta...@hotmail.fr; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>
>
> What type of binaries do you want to commi
x27;t
introduce any regressions.
Elias
From: tbergham...@google.com
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:23:41 +
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Add support for OCaml native debugging
To: e.bouta...@hotmail.fr; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
What type of binaries do you want to commit in?
Generally we don't li
context and DWARF parser.
Elias
From: ztur...@google.com
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:05:06 +
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Add support for OCaml native debugging
To: tbergham...@google.com; e.bouta...@hotmail.fr; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
I don't like the idea of not having tests. Promising test
I don't like the idea of not having tests. Promising tests and actually
delivering on them are two entirely different things. And without them, we
just end up with broken code and nobody to maintain it
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:23 AM Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
What type of binaries do you want to commit in?
Generally we don't like putting binaries to the repository because they are
not human readable so it is hard to review/diff them and they will only run
on a single platform and a single architecture while we support a lot of
different configuration.
