Yes, they do.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Nice! Out of curiosity, do all the unittests pass? (I expect they do, as
> they do everywhere else, just wondering)
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> This s
Nice! Out of curiosity, do all the unittests pass? (I expect they do, as
they do everywhere else, just wondering)
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This should be fixed with:
> $ svn commit
> unittests/Editline/CMakeLists.txt
> Transmitt
This should be fixed with:
$ svn commit
unittests/Editline/CMakeLists.txt
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 251264.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Okay this broke the cmake Linux build. I'm fixing that now...
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Todd Fiala wrote
Okay this broke the cmake Linux build. I'm fixing that now...
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Todd Fiala wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've taken a stab at getting the gtests in lldb/unittests to compile and
> run on Xcode. I just checked this in. There's a new scheme called
> lldb-gtest. If you run
Hi all,
I've taken a stab at getting the gtests in lldb/unittests to compile and
run on Xcode. I just checked this in. There's a new scheme called
lldb-gtest. If you run that in Xcode, it should build the DebugClang
variant of lldb and link against the gtest libraries that come with clang.
The
