Nice! Out of curiosity, do all the unittests pass? (I expect they do, as they do everywhere else, just wondering)
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This should be fixed with: > $ svn commit > unittests/Editline/CMakeLists.txt > Transmitting file data . > Committed revision 251264. > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Okay this broke the cmake Linux build. I'm fixing that now... >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've taken a stab at getting the gtests in lldb/unittests to compile and >>> run on Xcode. I just checked this in. There's a new scheme called >>> lldb-gtest. If you run that in Xcode, it should build the DebugClang >>> variant of lldb and link against the gtest libraries that come with clang. >>> The output goes out to the console when run. >>> >>> I don't currently have this hooked into any kind of aggregate target >>> yet. I want to make sure this works everywhere and doesn't break anything >>> before I make anything depend on it. >>> >>> I used a public OS X (10.11) and public Xcode (7.1, released this past >>> week) to do the changes. Please let me know if you use Xcode and if you >>> find that this target breaks (perhaps with an older version of Xcode). >>> >>> I put in a placeholder do-nothing gtest for our Editline code, partially >>> as a canary to see if I break any of the build bots. I'll be adding some >>> code there as soon as I know that I plugged it in right on the cmake side. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> -- >>> -Todd >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> -Todd >> > > > > -- > -Todd > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
