Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

2019-10-16 Thread Philip Reames via lldb-dev
On 10/16/19 5:51 PM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:46 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: On 10/16/2019 07:23 AM, Robinson, Paul wrote: > +1.  And put it in the email (subject?).  While it’s possible to derive a count from a hash manua

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

2019-10-16 Thread Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Stellard > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:14 PM > To: Roman Lebedev > Cc: Robinson, Paul ; Shoaib Meenai > ; Mehdi AMINI ; llvm- > d...@lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev ; openmp-dev (openmp- > d...@lists.llvm.org) ; LLDB Dev d...@lists.llvm.org> > Subject:

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

2019-10-16 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 10/16/2019 12:02 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:55 PM Tom Stellard wrote: >> >> On 10/16/2019 07:31 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: >>> +1, please. >>> >>> Also, putting a tag on the *first* commit in the repo, >>> and doing `git describe --match FIRST_COMMIT_TAG` will be *great*

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

2019-10-16 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
On 10/16/2019 07:31 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: > +1, please. > > Also, putting a tag on the *first* commit in the repo, > and doing `git describe --match FIRST_COMMIT_TAG` will be *great*! > Do we need to add a tag or is `git rev-list --count HEAD` good enough? -Tom > Roman. > > On Wed, Oct 16

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

2019-10-16 Thread Diana Picus via lldb-dev
Hi, Is this monotonic incrementing identifier part of the email? I think it would really complicate buildbot maintenance if we didn't have it in obvious places. For instance, we have a (hacky) monitoring page for our ARM/AArch64 buildbots [1] and it really helps a lot to just look at the commit ra