Greg,
Many thanks for your answers.
For me, the builtin ncurses-GUI mode of LLDB is a unique selling point compared
to GDB. Only, my impression is that not many developers are aware of this
fantastic feature and keep on breaking their fingers on the debuggers command
line not by choice but bec
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:58:02 +0100, Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev wrote:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D40212
...
> Is it OK to just use in-class member variable initializers and:
> void Clear() {
> this->~ClassName();
> new (this) ClassName();
> }
> ?
FYI Greg Clayton in th
I wrote the "gui" mode many years ago in hope we would get people to work on it
and improve it. No changes have been made since it was originally done. I would
welcome any patches to help improve "gui" mode and make it great. I was never
able to take the time to improve it to where it needs to b
Hi,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40212
At least DWARFCompileUnit and I see even for example MachVMRegion duplicate
intialization of fields in both their constructor and Clear(). Moreover the
initialization is in different place than declaration of the member variable.
Is it OK to just use in-class
Sorry, I confused the version numbers.
FreeBSD 11 came with llvm 3.8, and FreeBSD 11.1 is using llvm 4.0. However, I
just ran a debugging session with lldb 5 from llvm-5-devel from the ports on
FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE (x86-64) and it showed the same issue.
Best regards
Rolf
> Am 16.11.2017 um 18
Hello,
I am not sure whether this is an issue with FreeBSD or lldb, please point me
into the right direction.
Recently I updated from FreeBSD 11 (system llvm/clang/lldb 4.0) to FreeBSD 11.1
(system llvm/clang/lldb 5.0). Now I am back working on one of my threaded
server programs and in the pas
