hfinkel added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41702#969179, @labath wrote:
> Is the only difference between ppc64 and ppc64le ABIs in the endianness of
> the values?
> If so, could we make one unified ABI which takes the endianness as an
> argument (in the constructor, or as a template
hfinkel added inline comments.
Comment at: source/Core/ArchSpec.cpp:375
SUBTYPE_MASK},
+{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_POWERPC64, CPU_ANY,
+ UINT32_MAX, SUBTYPE_MASK},
I doubt this is needed. There's no Darwin support to spe
hfinkel accepted this revision.
hfinkel added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Comment at: source/Core/ArchSpec.cpp:375
SUBTYPE_MASK},
+{ArchSpec::eCore_ppc64le_generic, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_POWERPC64, CPU_ANY,
+ UINT32_MAX, SUBTYPE