hfinkel added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41702#969179, @labath wrote:
> Is the only difference between ppc64 and ppc64le ABIs in the endianness of > the values? > If so, could we make one unified ABI which takes the endianness as an > argument (in the constructor, or as a template argument, or deduces it from > target endiannes, ...) ? The ABIs have some other differences. The largest difference between the ABIs is how indirect-calls (and, thus, function pointers) work. There are some other more-minor differences, for example, some of the call-frame offsets are different. It still might be possible to unify the support (we certainly have one backend in LLVM for both), but it's a bit more involved than just switching the endianness. https://reviews.llvm.org/D41702 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
