@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+"""Test that lldb on Darwin ignores metadata in the top byte of addresses."""
+
+import os
+import re
+import subprocess
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+"""Test that lldb on Darwin ignores metadata in the top byte of addresses."""
+
+import os
+import re
+import subprocess
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+"""Test that lldb on Darwin ignores metadata in the top byte of addresses."""
DavidSpickett wrote:
Oh I get it, you're running a process first then making a core file and
expecting to get the same output.
This needs to be made clear at the top
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+"""Test that lldb on Darwin ignores metadata in the top byte of addresses."""
+
+import os
+import re
+import subprocess
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#include
+#include
+union ptrbytes {
+ int *p;
+ uint8_t bytes[8];
+};
DavidSpickett wrote:
I like this way of avoiding shifts.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84998
___
lldb-commits mai
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
Doing this in its own commit so the intent of the previous change is clearer.
>From a251b494614a0700f424c2bedebcabd2e053a653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:08:25 +00
DavidSpickett wrote:
This is a stacked PR, first commit here is
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84147.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85058
This extends the existing register fields support from AArch64 Linux
to AArch64 FreeBSD. So you will now see output like this:
```
(lldb) register read cpsr
cpsr = 0x6200
= (N = 0, Z = 1, C
DavidSpickett wrote:
This is a stacked PR, the first two commits are
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84147 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85058
___
lldb-commits mailing list
ll
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-03-13T14:15:30Z
New Revision: eb21ee49cff081911d99d29ba887c1715fc2b8fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb21ee49cff081911d99d29ba887c1715fc2b8fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eb21ee49cff081911d99d29ba887c1715fc2b8fc.diff
LOG
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-03-13T14:30:40Z
New Revision: 4e49ee55c587637e17dec7a72b9ce86d85f8f241
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4e49ee55c587637e17dec7a72b9ce86d85f8f241
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4e49ee55c587637e17dec7a72b9ce86d85f8f241.diff
LOG
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84998
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Thanks for the fix! We (Linaro) were about to look into this ourselves.
I'm going to merge this now so we can see if it works ASAP.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85200
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.l
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85200
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85200
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I will be away for a while so @jasonmolenda please merge it if it looks fine to
you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82603
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84147
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
>From 705a1a50f9ce847e5dcece3607eb2e95fb8ca18e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:08:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] clang-format AuxVector.h
Doing this in its own comm
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Yes that's because I corrected the title in the previous PR but did not on this
branch. I've landed that previous PR and updated this so it's only the
formatting change now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
___
lld
DavidSpickett wrote:
Going to merge this without approval now that it's a simple clang-format.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lld
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85057
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85058
>From a18b685eda074527abdd127456681b03ec2aed0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:40 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][FreeBSD][AArch64] Enable register field detection
T
DavidSpickett wrote:
@emaste the previous PRs have landed so this is just a single commit now,
easier to review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85058
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-04-03T15:05:13Z
New Revision: 7c178fdf0094afbf4757d71b792bc159ddcac72f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c178fdf0094afbf4757d71b792bc159ddcac72f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7c178fdf0094afbf4757d71b792bc159ddcac72f.diff
LOG
DavidSpickett wrote:
When I tried these on Arm, `.note.gnu.build-id` was not the issue, it was
failures like those seen in the Fuschia logs.
`/bin/sh: 1: ifeq: not found` and `/bin/sh: 1:
/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/bin/dwp: not found` (plus some other tools).
Leave the tests disabled on Arm and
@@ -3433,8 +3433,40 @@ bool GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::CalculateMD5(
return false;
if (response.Peek() && *response.Peek() == 'x')
return false;
-low = response.GetHexMaxU64(false, UINT64_MAX);
-high = response.GetHexMaxU64(false, UINT64_MAX);
+
+
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ bool Platform::IsCompatibleArchitecture(const ArchSpec
&arch,
Status Platform::PutFile(const FileSpec &source, const FileSpec &destination,
uint32_t uid, uint32_t gid) {
Log *log = GetLog(LLDBLog::Platform);
- LLDB_LOGF(log, "[
@@ -1197,6 +1197,34 @@ Status Platform::PutFile(const FileSpec &source, const
FileSpec &destination,
if (!source_file)
return Status(source_file.takeError());
Status error;
+
+ bool requires_upload = true;
+ {
DavidSpickett wrote:
If you really need
DavidSpickett wrote:
@weliveindetail I think this might fix the problems you were having remote
debugging clang-repl (I can't seem to find the actual Discourse thread).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88812
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb
DavidSpickett wrote:
I think this will fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/47549. And
make the note at the end of `lldb/docs/use/qemu-testing.rst` outdated.
For testing we might be able to send the platform the gdbserver spawn packets
and check that it doesn't return the same port
@@ -324,6 +335,10 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
// connections while a connection is active.
acceptor_up.reset();
}
+
+GDBRemoteCommunicationServerPlatform::PortMap portmap_for_child;
+portmap_for_child.AllowPort(*port);
@@ -301,13 +294,31 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
+std::optional port = 0;
if (g_server) {
// Collect child zombie processes.
#if !defined(_WIN32)
- while (waitpid(-
@@ -301,13 +294,31 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
+std::optional port = 0;
DavidSpickett wrote:
If we're going to use optional then this should be left to default co
@@ -301,13 +294,31 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
+std::optional port = 0;
if (g_server) {
// Collect child zombie processes.
#if !defined(_WIN32)
- while (waitpid(-
DavidSpickett wrote:
Will fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85084.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88494
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+"""
+Test that the process continues running after we detach from it.
+"""
+
+import lldb
+import time
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class DetachResumesTestCase(TestBase):
DavidSpickett wrote:
Thanks for looking into this. I had no idea what it might be but your
explanation makes a lot of sense.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88494
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88494
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88494
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Looks fine but can you just confirm what
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d1a69e4a6ee0b04778da7728123c47eef2290564/lldb/bindings/python/get-python-config.py#L70
reports?
I assume this does not include `_d`, otherwise there would be no need for this
fix?
https://
DavidSpickett wrote:
The best docs I can find are https://peps.python.org/pep-0720/:
"Interpreter-specific Python extension (native module) suffix — generally
defined as .{SOABI}.{SHLIB_SUFFIX}."
Which is less than helpful. https://peps.python.org/pep-3149/ mentions Windows
uses a different fo
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-04-17T09:19:26Z
New Revision: a16bb0701409376dee3a587ae351a6019d6de4e0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a16bb0701409376dee3a587ae351a6019d6de4e0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a16bb0701409376dee3a587ae351a6019d6de4e0.diff
LOG
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89042
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/running-lldb-in-a-container/76801/4 found that the
obvious way to use this variable doesn't work, despite what our docs and
examples say.
Perhaps in the past it did but now yo
DavidSpickett wrote:
So this PR fixes debug lldb -> release Python, but if I configured against a
debug Python then the suffix would be `_d_d`.
Debug lldb/release Python is a valid config I think, and likely what 99% of
people want anyway. So can we add a check whether the suffix already has `
DavidSpickett wrote:
If it were a GDB packet it would be in
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Host-I_002fO-Packets.html#Host-I_002fO-Packets
but I see no sign of it, or in GDB's sources.
The first appearance of `vFile:MD5` is e0f8f574c7f41f5b61ec01aa290d52fc55a3f3c9
thoug
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89042
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -282,17 +282,10 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
}
}
- do {
-GDBRemoteCommunicationServerPlatform platform(
-acceptor_up->GetSocketProtocol(), acceptor_up->GetSocketScheme());
-
-if (port_offset > 0)
DavidSpickett wrote:
@@ -301,13 +294,35 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
if (g_server) {
// Collect child zombie processes.
#if !defined(_WIN32)
- while (waitpid(-1, nullptr, WNOHANG) > 0)
-
@@ -301,13 +294,35 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
if (g_server) {
// Collect child zombie processes.
#if !defined(_WIN32)
- while (waitpid(-1, nullptr, WNOHANG) > 0)
-
@@ -301,13 +294,35 @@ int main_platform(int argc, char *argv[]) {
exit(socket_error);
}
printf("Connection established.\n");
+
if (g_server) {
// Collect child zombie processes.
#if !defined(_WIN32)
- while (waitpid(-1, nullptr, WNOHANG) > 0)
-
DavidSpickett wrote:
@bulbazord please give the final approval if it looks good to you.
We can sort out moving from MD5 on an issue.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88812
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
These are extensions the lldb platform has to:
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Host-I_002fO-Packets.html#Host-I_002fO-Packets
>From 518cb052ee364192fc5c813a2962f80f39345cd5 Mon Sep 17
DavidSpickett wrote:
Ideally they'd be in some sort of order but they are already not, and I'm
thinking it would be good to get these on the website anyway. So I'm leaving
concerns like that until later.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
__
DavidSpickett wrote:
> So a good follow up PR would be to list it in that document. It's self
> explanatory but still, weird that it's not there.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88812
___
lldb
DavidSpickett wrote:
> @bulbazord can you or someone with write permissions revert this PR so I have
> time to triage the issue?
The next build is green, those DAP tests do fail once in a while so it's
unrelated to your change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88812
_
DavidSpickett wrote:
Please address @JDevlieghere's comments in a new PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88812
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Subsequent PRs will build on this:
* Enable Markdown support in the website build.
* Use a script to convert this file to Markdown.
* Hand correct the result.
So we:
1. Have this on the website, just like GDB's protocol specs and
2. It's in a format that's easier to contribu
@@ -429,7 +429,43 @@ incompatible with the flags that gdb specifies.
//
// Response is F, followed by the number of bytes written (base 16)
+//--
+// vFile:MD5:
+//
+// BRIEF
+// Generate an MD5 hash of the
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
>From 518cb052ee364192fc5c813a2962f80f39345cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:15:54 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][Docs] Document vFile:exists and vFile:MD5
Thes
@@ -429,7 +429,43 @@ incompatible with the flags that gdb specifies.
//
// Response is F, followed by the number of bytes written (base 16)
+//--
+// vFile:MD5:
+//
+// BRIEF
+// Generate an MD5 hash of the
DavidSpickett wrote:
@emaste ping!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85058
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -75,6 +75,12 @@ if (LLDB_ENABLE_PYTHON)
endif()
endif()
endforeach()
+ if(WIN32 AND CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL Debug)
+string(SUBSTRING ${LLDB_PYTHON_EXT_SUFFIX} 0 2 FIRST_2_CHARS)
+if(NOT FIRST_2_CHARS STREQUAL "_d")
DavidSpickett wrote:
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716
RST is powerful but usually too powerful for 90% of what we need it for.
Markdown is easier to edit and can be previewed easily without building the
entire website.
This copies what llvm does already, mak
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89587
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I'll include this as a commit in a larger PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89587
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
As it stands this PR *will not* build, because it requires
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716. I wanted to put up both to
show what I'm going to do with all this.
First https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716 should land, so we can
flush out any build
DavidSpickett wrote:
This will be used by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89718, but I
would like to land this PR first to flush out any bot config problems.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-
DavidSpickett wrote:
Opened https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89718 instead, which has all
the conversion steps in it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89587
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
The CI build "worked" but there is this warning:
```
/home/runner/work/llvm-project/llvm-project/lldb/docs/index.rst:146: WARNING:
toctree contains reference to nonexisting document 'resources/lldbgdbremote'
```
Which is what I expected. Once it knows to look for Markdown it
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89716
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89718
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89913
As before, script did most of the work, hand edits after that.
There's a lot more we can do dedupe this and the packets doc, this will come in
a follow up PR.
>From d9b8ee42dfb753012f2f7032d7fb2dfde3e440f
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM
I can merge this for you if you don't have commit access, otherwise go ahead
and merge it yourself.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89037
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-c
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89037
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89913
>From d9b8ee42dfb753012f2f7032d7fb2dfde3e440f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:21:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][Docs] Make formatting in platform packet doc
r
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89913
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90029
So we aren't describing the same packets twice. Basically turning the platform
doc into a list of cross links.
qLaunchSuccess was missing a description so I added one.
The links will have text generated f
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90029
>From 034efa46305f001092bbaacd563d9d2635ed49ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:21:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][Docs] Link from platform doc to extensions doc
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90029
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I'll remove the "Brief" subtitles after this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90029
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
I forgot I didn't land this, so I will instead push a Markdown version of the
same content once the other PRs have landed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
@@ -1,484 +1,49 @@
# LLDB Platform Packets
-Here is a brief overview of the packets that an lldb platform server
+This is a list of the packets that an lldb platform server
needs to implement for the lldb testsuite to be run on a remote
target device/system.
These are almo
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90059
When an enum is used to represent certain data it can be useful to know its
name and the value of it. For instance, register fields are often set in source
code as numbers, but in the debugger you'd like t
DavidSpickett wrote:
This is the first change for
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-register-field-enums-to-lldb/77275,
though there has been a change of plans and now I'm implementing existing GDB
features to get the same result.
It is a subset of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90063
This represents the enum type that can be assigned to a field using the
`` element in the target XML.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Enum-Target-Types.html
Each enumerator has:
* A
DavidSpickett wrote:
> It's also not clear how this new "presentation mode" is going to be
> controlled. While it's not in the scope of this PR, it would be nice if you
> can share a bigger picture.
For me the picture is limited to register printing. I'll be setting this new
option on the reg
DavidSpickett wrote:
I understand, so the value is made from `a | b | c` for example. I didn't think
of whether register fields could hit this path, but it's equivalent to a C enum
they'll be using, so I think it could happen.
I'll test this, thanks for bringing it up.
https://github.com/llvm
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90029
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-04-26T09:45:17+01:00
New Revision: bd53c7cce418fe7f3e171859d4718df15d03dc2b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bd53c7cce418fe7f3e171859d4718df15d03dc2b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bd53c7cce418fe7f3e171859d4718df15d03dc2b.diff
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Landed as markdown in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bd53c7cce418fe7f3e171859d4718df15d03dc2b.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89357
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90183
This removes the "Brief" and "Description" subtitles and merges the text of
both so that the contents listing is clearer.
>From 97468a99808fa0562f6c157b8a2703c48acc5ebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90183
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90443
This removes various subtitles or converts them to bold text so that the table
of contents is less cluttered.
This includes "Example", "Notes", "Priority To Implement" and "Response".
>From 7810ba3e09ef94
DavidSpickett wrote:
After this I am going to sort the entries into alphabetical order and split out
the ones that are extensions to existing packets - then I should be done with
this doc :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90443
___
lldb-co
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2024-04-29T11:41:14+01:00
New Revision: 0c8151ac809c283187e9b19d0cbe72a09c8d74e0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c8151ac809c283187e9b19d0cbe72a09c8d74e0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0c8151ac809c283187e9b19d0cbe72a09c8d74e0.diff
https://github.com/DavidSpickett closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90443
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90585
This was last modified in 4fd3347d6e4b0c873c789528e1c9a1b55990d1b6 in 2021 and
was made obsolete by the RST version that
edb874b2310dc6eeaa27330ca1b1c013da7bdd65 added in 2019.
There are some differences
1001 - 1100 of 2681 matches
Mail list logo
