Author: Walter Erquinigo
Date: 2024-11-01T17:33:08-04:00
New Revision: c1df376b0c8b3edbb6c5ad3fb6ebf39e75b5ad88
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1df376b0c8b3edbb6c5ad3fb6ebf39e75b5ad88
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1df376b0c8b3edbb6c5ad3fb6ebf39e75b5ad88.di
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113508
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Dave Lee (kastiglione)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectDWIMPrint.cpp (+8-8)
``diff
diff --git a/lldb/source/Command
https://github.com/kastiglione created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
None
>From e244e4557a618c6d532f9d369624234ad739cf11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Lee
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:38:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Avoid unnecessary regex check in dwim-print
---
lld
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114507
>From 9a269fa83cea529f704c9eba339eac9987032155 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:42:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Create dependent modules in parallel
MIME-Ve
https://github.com/jasonmolenda approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114507
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/jimingham created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114628
When you set a "next branch breakpoint" and run to it while stepping, you have
to claim the stop at that breakpoint to be the top of the inlined call stack,
or you will seem to "step in" and then plans might
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (jimingham)
Changes
When you set a "next branch breakpoint" and run to it while stepping, you have
to claim the stop at that breakpoint to be the top of the inlined call stack,
or you will seem to "step in" and then plans might try to
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
80b9f07436617d650bdab7035394705f643d1b19...042ac07ed67a5465aaf5c2dc8c4396adf5da2948
lldb/
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 80b9f07436617d650bdab7035394705f643d1b19
042ac07ed67a5465aaf5c2dc8c4396adf5da2948 --e
Author: Dave Lee
Date: 2024-11-01T13:39:14-07:00
New Revision: 2bd21b26e26e5a4b962307d30c8e6279b464bf02
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bd21b26e26e5a4b962307d30c8e6279b464bf02
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bd21b26e26e5a4b962307d30c8e6279b464bf02.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/kastiglione edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/augusto2112 approved this pull request.
Nice! This code lives upstream though so you'll need to open a patch there too
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
kastiglione wrote:
I will cherry-pick this downstream to swiftlang/llvm-project too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/adrian-prantl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114333
>From c9a4d24f222a70c7c108deebb6c25222893d7159 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Lee
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:42:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Load embedded type summary section (#7859) (#8040)
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114628
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -395,7 +394,44 @@ bool ThreadPlanStepRange::SetNextBranchBreakpoint() {
m_next_branch_bp_sp->GetID(), bp_site_id,
run_to_address.GetLoadAddress(&m_process.GetTarget()));
}
-
+// The "next branch breakpoint might land on
Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
Date: 2024-11-01T08:55:23-07:00
New Revision: d6a150137773bd1d104aa5a1847863a5138f14d9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6a150137773bd1d104aa5a1847863a5138f14d9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6a150137773bd1d104aa5a1847863a51
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-11-01T11:03:19-07:00
New Revision: f33b5b79372c7a46e2e6b89a314bce0009bf4ab7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f33b5b79372c7a46e2e6b89a314bce0009bf4ab7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f33b5b79372c7a46e2e6b89a314bce0009bf4ab7.d
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-11-01T11:06:18-07:00
New Revision: 16a6c10bd485979ba2edf4b487d633230a9df01f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16a6c10bd485979ba2edf4b487d633230a9df01f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16a6c10bd485979ba2edf4b487d633230a9df01f.d
Author: Alex Langford
Date: 2024-11-01T11:12:29-07:00
New Revision: c3782f67daf462f6b289b5898cb65c61f64c197d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c3782f67daf462f6b289b5898cb65c61f64c197d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c3782f67daf462f6b289b5898cb65c61f64c197d.diff
https://github.com/bulbazord closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114469
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Zequan Wu
Date: 2024-11-01T14:15:54-04:00
New Revision: 0cfcd387f968f2c9de0648673b5db9e221e5c84e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0cfcd387f968f2c9de0648673b5db9e221e5c84e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0cfcd387f968f2c9de0648673b5db9e221e5c84e.diff
LOG
https://github.com/ZequanWu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/ZequanWu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114303
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
felipepiovezan wrote:
It's interesting that the 17.0 bot is still not happy:
```
File
"/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake-matrix/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py",
line 321, in check_value
test_base.assertEqual(
AssertionError: '"Hello"' !=
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
In D148380 [1], Alex added locking to PathMappingLists. The current
implementation runs the callback under the lock, which I don't believe is
necessary. As far as I can tell, no users of the callbac
JDevlieghere wrote:
The test failures were both caused by the locking in `PathMappingList`, which
I'm addressing in #114576.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114507
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
In D148380 [1], Alex added locking to PathMappingLists. The current
implementation runs the callback under the lock, which I don't believe is
necessary. As far as I can tell, no users of the callback are r
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114507
>From 9a269fa83cea529f704c9eba339eac9987032155 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:42:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] Create dependent modules in parallel
MIME-Ve
@@ -1608,9 +1612,28 @@ void Target::SetExecutableModule(ModuleSP &executable_sp,
if (image_module_sp) {
added_modules.AppendIfNeeded(image_module_sp, false);
ObjectFile *objfile = image_module_sp->GetObjectFile();
- if (objfile)
+ i
vogelsgesang wrote:
FWIW, codelldb also dereferences pointers and references when displaying
values. They [provide a user-facing
setting](https://github.com/vadimcn/codelldb/blob/v1.10.0/MANUAL.md#pointers)
for it and [implement it in the debug
adapter](https://github.com/vadimcn/codelldb/blo
Michael137 wrote:
> It's interesting that the 17.0 bot is still not happy:
>
>
>
> ```
>
> File
> "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake-matrix/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py",
> line 321, in check_value
>
> test_base.assertEqual(
>
> As
felipepiovezan wrote:
> > It's interesting that the 17.0 bot is still not happy:
> > ```
> >
> > File
> > "/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake-matrix/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py",
> > line 321, in check_value
> >
> > test_base.assertEqu
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/vogelsgesang updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113787
>From af45bc2e24623d7225d24a4680a28630d67d636e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Vogelsgesang
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:34:31 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [lldb-dap] Support column breakpoints
This commi
Michael137 wrote:
Example constructor decl would look like the following:
```
| `-CXXConstructorDecl 0x246e6f8 <> Bar 'void ()'
| `-StructorMangledNamesAttr 0x246e7c0 <> Implicit
2:$__lldb_func_0x014B6560:257 1:$__lldb_func_0x014B6560:294
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610
>From ef1aaf94b52726c77e5569c84c09ecdd73811abd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:02:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Highlight "note:" in CommandReturnObject
We have
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
>From 9ebfdc84c46a795d35b4dd157573b97a57b232ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:58:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Improve locking in PathMappingLists (NFC)
In
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1608,9 +1612,48 @@ void Target::SetExecutableModule(ModuleSP &executable_sp,
if (image_module_sp) {
added_modules.AppendIfNeeded(image_module_sp, false);
ObjectFile *objfile = image_module_sp->GetObjectFile();
- if (objfile)
-
@@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ PathMappingList::PathMappingList(const PathMappingList &rhs)
const PathMappingList &PathMappingList::operator=(const PathMappingList &rhs) {
if (this != &rhs) {
-std::scoped_lock
locks(m_mutex, rhs.m_mutex);
+std::scoped_lock pairs_locks(m_pairs_m
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2024-11-01T16:38:14-07:00
New Revision: c8209943faeead43c6932c5ddcc69c9e9d1e4262
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c8209943faeead43c6932c5ddcc69c9e9d1e4262
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c8209943faeead43c6932c5ddcc69c9e9d1e4262.d
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kastiglione edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1608,9 +1612,28 @@ void Target::SetExecutableModule(ModuleSP &executable_sp,
if (image_module_sp) {
added_modules.AppendIfNeeded(image_module_sp, false);
ObjectFile *objfile = image_module_sp->GetObjectFile();
- if (objfile)
+ i
https://github.com/kastiglione closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114478
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ static llvm::raw_ostream &warning(Stream &strm) {
<< "warning: ";
}
+static llvm::raw_ostream ¬e(Stream &strm) {
augusto2112 wrote:
Actually `error` and `warning` are not capitalized, I guess we can either keep
all three lower cas
@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ class CommandReturnObject {
void AppendMessageWithFormat(const char *format, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3)));
+ void AppendNote(llvm::StringRef in_string);
+
+ void AppendNoteWithFormat(const char *format, ...)
+ __attribute__((fo
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ static llvm::raw_ostream &warning(Stream &strm) {
<< "warning: ";
}
+static llvm::raw_ostream ¬e(Stream &strm) {
augusto2112 wrote:
Since `note` is a function should it be capitalized to follow the LLDB style?
https://github.com/l
https://github.com/augusto2112 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kastiglione approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
I was going to say this is not the right way to do this, but I suppose there
isn't really a better mechanism available, since this isn't an error. Otherwise
you'd be better off joining a diagnostic error with the note so the UI layer
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
walter-erquinigo wrote:
I was able to make it work using @labath 's suggestion. Fortunately it just
works.
Please give it another look :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113508
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113508
>From dce501d494a3d559d490f8d58f6918b63ed9d175 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: walter erquinigo
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:49:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLDB] Finish implementing support for DW_FORM_d
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
https://github.com/augusto2112 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
https://github.com/adrian-prantl commented:
@kastiglione Is there a way to turn this into a test? Apparently this works:
```
(lldb) p ;
(lldb)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114478
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/kastiglione edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114608
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113521
>From 819380f93381eff8200c7eb9c55372f9a840c379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: walter erquinigo
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:17:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add a target.launch-working-dir setting
Inte
JDevlieghere wrote:
Motivated by #114608
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610
We have helpers to emit warnings and errors. Do the same thing for notes to
they stand out more.
>From 155396aa89fd418268cfcf8d054849c67bf1207e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Fri,
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
We have helpers to emit warnings and errors. Do the same thing for notes to
they stand out more.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114610.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void CommandObjectDWIMPrint::DoExecute(StringRef command,
// Add a hint if object description was requested, but no description
// function was implemented.
auto maybe_add_hint = [&](llvm::StringRef output) {
+static bool note_shown = false;
+
@@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ PathMappingList::PathMappingList(const PathMappingList &rhs)
const PathMappingList &PathMappingList::operator=(const PathMappingList &rhs) {
if (this != &rhs) {
-std::scoped_lock
locks(m_mutex, rhs.m_mutex);
+std::scoped_lock pairs_locks(m_pairs_m
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
It took me some time to read this and think about the implications, but I think
this is generally okay. I left 1 comment about the order of lock acquisition
for `operator=`.
The only way I can see this going wrong is if a callback can mutate the list in
slackito wrote:
Repro was pretty straightforward from the description above.
common.cc:
```c++
#include
#define XSTR(x) STR(x)
#define STR(x) #x
namespace NAMESPACE {
void DoSomeStuff() {
printf("%s::DoSomeStuff()\n", XSTR(NAMESPACE));
}
} // end NAMESPACE
```
main.cc:
```c++
namespace
slackito wrote:
Hi,
I'm having some problems with one of our tests, that also reproduce after
[#114337](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114337).
I don't have a repro yet but I'll describe what I know of the problem so far in
case it rings a bell.
The test in question has a common s
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113508
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -1608,9 +1612,28 @@ void Target::SetExecutableModule(ModuleSP &executable_sp,
if (image_module_sp) {
added_modules.AppendIfNeeded(image_module_sp, false);
ObjectFile *objfile = image_module_sp->GetObjectFile();
- if (objfile)
+ i
https://github.com/jasonmolenda edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114507
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> > Agree with Pavel.
>
> I'm not sure you do :P
>
> > > When libcxx is linked with a program as an archive of static libraries,
> > > functions that aren't used in the program are omitted.
> >
> >
> > This really isn't the problem. The tests _want_ those symbols to not be
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
Naive implementation of all the parts of following RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-lldb-handling-abi-tagged-constructors-destructors-in-expression-evaluator/82816
Main changes:
1. Instead of relying on
@@ -140,6 +141,64 @@ void MangleContext::mangleName(GlobalDecl GD, raw_ostream
&Out) {
const ASTContext &ASTContext = getASTContext();
const NamedDecl *D = cast(GD.getDecl());
+ if (const StructorMangledNamesAttr *SMA =
+ D->getAttr()) {
+CXXConstructorDecl
DavidSpickett wrote:
dwarfdump:
[arm_dwarfdump.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17598949/arm_dwarfdump.txt)
(this doesn't seem different to what AArch64 produces)
objdump:
[arm_objdump.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17598953/arm_objdump.txt)
stepping log:
[arm_st
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
>From 9337e170d920eaabe2b59a25622f0c554ca5afcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:35:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [WIP][lldb][Expression] More reliable function call
resolutio
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114529
>From 7f18d96b7117e83c4ed246ac498ee4c9a72064ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:35:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [WIP][lldb][Expression] More reliable function call
resolutio
85 matches
Mail list logo
