https://github.com/bulbazord commented:
It took me some time to read this and think about the implications, but I think this is generally okay. I left 1 comment about the order of lock acquisition for `operator=`. The only way I can see this going wrong is if a callback can mutate the list in a way that triggers yet another callback? Not sure we should be too concerned about that right now though. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114576 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
