@@ -82,15 +82,24 @@ class MinidumpFile : public Binary {
return getListStream(minidump::StreamType::ThreadList);
}
- /// Returns the contents of the Exception stream. An error is returned if
the
- /// file does not contain this stream, or the stream is smaller than t
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ class ProcessMinidump : public PostMortemProcess {
private:
lldb::DataBufferSP m_core_data;
llvm::ArrayRef m_thread_list;
- const minidump::ExceptionStream *m_active_exception;
+ std::unordered_map m_exceptions_by_tid;
Jlalond wrote:
@@ -82,15 +82,24 @@ class MinidumpFile : public Binary {
return getListStream(minidump::StreamType::ThreadList);
}
- /// Returns the contents of the Exception stream. An error is returned if
the
- /// file does not contain this stream, or the stream is smaller than t
jeffreytan81 wrote:
> Why does the ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout have to claim to explain stops
> (like a random breakpoint hit) that on the face of it it's not responsible for
We are doing so to ensure `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` can stay in the leaf
thread plan. And it comes from your su
@@ -58,10 +58,17 @@ DAP::DAP()
DAP::~DAP() = default;
+/// Return string with first character capitalized.
+static std::string capitalize(llvm::StringRef str) {
+ if (str.empty())
+return "";
+ return ((llvm::Twine)llvm::toUpper(str[0]) + str.drop_front()).str();
+}
+
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97871
>From aa2ad3b675f67581dde07a476725d2574fc6e7da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: walter erquinigo
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 20:30:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb-dap] Support throw and catch exception breakpoin
https://github.com/bulbazord created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98089
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97511
>From 31b3d4db2389dd4bd72b54618ba12c86f51fe02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Langford
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:24:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb]
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Alex Langford (bulbazord)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97511
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98089.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Target/StackFrameList.cpp (+3-3)
bulbazord wrote:
This is the exact same PR as https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/8952
(on apple's LLVM fork). It should have gone here first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98089
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/sayhaan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98094
Refactors address writers to create an instance for each CU and its DWO CU.
>From b2fe35ae825dc757ea1daaf49142e789c4a560fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Ayupov
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:37:41 -0700
Subject:
jimingham wrote:
> > Why does the ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout have to claim to explain stops
> > (like a random breakpoint hit) that on the face of it it's not responsible
> > for
>
> Just a quick comment to add the context for this question: we are doing so to
> ensure `ThreadPlanSingleThr
Author: Kevin Frei
Date: 2024-07-08T16:44:16-07:00
New Revision: 2a7abb04e258542679476fa6527418c34412283c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a7abb04e258542679476fa6527418c34412283c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2a7abb04e258542679476fa6527418c34412283c.diff
LO
https://github.com/clayborg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96802
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `lldb` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/1213
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
https://github.com/kevinfrei created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98101
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96802
Attempt #5 fails. It's been 6 months. I despise Makefile.rules and have no
ability to even *detect* these failures without _landing_ a diff. In the mean
time, we have no testin
https://github.com/kevinfrei ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98101
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/walter-erquinigo approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98089
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Kevin Frei (kevinfrei)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96802
Attempt #5 fails. It's been 6 months. I despise Makefile.rules and have
no ability to even *detect* these failures without _landing_ a diff. In the
mean time, we have no testi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff f6eda6fb7a335861d8a8ce32ea805830685f218d
76f102112c8a8a1292929b65ebb7db8b033ee344 --
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98101
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/clayborg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98101
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Kevin Frei
Date: 2024-07-08T17:59:00-07:00
New Revision: b2fd1ebc3523d225956120052bcc0698adf4579f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2fd1ebc3523d225956120052bcc0698adf4579f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2fd1ebc3523d225956120052bcc0698adf4579f.diff
LO
https://github.com/jasonmolenda updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96260
>From 9b541e6a035635e26c6a24eca022de8552fa4c17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Molenda
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:53:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [lldb] Change lldb's breakpoint handling behavior
lldb
jasonmolenda wrote:
Thanks again for all the help @AlexK0 I pushed an update that should compile
correctly with my update. It's great to hear that the testsuite looks clean --
that's the part that worried me the most about these changes.
I finished an aarch64 Ubuntu testsuite run and it is cl
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98089
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98041
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
