jeffreytan81 wrote: > Why does the ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout have to claim to explain stops > (like a random breakpoint hit) that on the face of it it's not responsible for
We are doing so to ensure `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` can stay in the leaf thread plan. And it comes from your suggestion `So ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout should always say it explains the stop` in this comment: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599/17?u=jeffreytan81 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90930 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
