krytarowski added a comment.
Thanks, since it has been accepted. I will commit it and move to LLDBStandalone.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I like this solution.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://list
krytarowski added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417919, @zturner wrote:
> Ahh ok. Well setting it to 2.8.12 is still fine, if that fixes the problem
> with no other changes then that seems like the best fix.
No other changes are needed.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.l
Ahh ok. Well setting it to 2.8.12 is still fine, if that fixes the problem
with no other changes then that seems like the best fix.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:23 PM Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> krytarowski added a comment.
>
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417911, @zturner wrote:
>
> > Can't yo
krytarowski added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417911, @zturner wrote:
> Can't you just remove that line and let it inherit the minimum version from
> LLVM?
It doesn't work.
CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt:
No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of c
Can't you just remove that line and let it inherit the minimum version from
LLVM?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:58 PM Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> krytarowski updated this revision to Diff 55729.
> krytarowski added a comment.
>
> Set minimal required CMake to 2.8.12.2 - fixes build on NetBSD with CMak
krytarowski updated this revision to Diff 55729.
krytarowski added a comment.
Set minimal required CMake to 2.8.12.2 - fixes build on NetBSD with CMake 3.5.2
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685
Files:
CMakeLists.txt
cmake/modules/LLDBStandalone.cmake
Index: cmake/modules/
krytarowski added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685#417896, @zturner wrote:
> I don't think we should be adding more CMake hacks in lldb when llvm is
> supposed to handle this. Why don't the existing lines work?
I don't know. Perhaps because LLVM and Clang requires newer cmake than
I don't think we should be adding more CMake hacks in lldb when llvm is
supposed to handle this. Why don't the existing lines work?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:24 PM Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> krytarowski added a comment.
>
> I had this working with 2.8:
>
> --- source/Plugins/SymbolFile/PDB/CMake
krytarowski added a comment.
I had this working with 2.8:
--- source/Plugins/SymbolFile/PDB/CMakeLists.txt.orig 2016-04-27
00:55:50.0 +
+++ source/Plugins/SymbolFile/PDB/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
-set(LLVM_PRIVATE_LINK_COMPONENTS
-DebugInfoPDB)
+#set(LLVM_PRIV
clayborg resigned from this revision.
clayborg removed a reviewer: clayborg.
clayborg added a comment.
I will the unix / cmake experts make the decision here.
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-c
zturner added a subscriber: zturner.
zturner added a comment.
Agree, the build should work with 2.8.12, but feel free to take advantage
of newer cmake features if they're present
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19685
___
lldb-commits
labath added a reviewer: zturner.
labath added a comment.
cmake 2.8 is still widely used (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS for one, but there are people
around using even longer lived versions of RedHat). I don't think we should
bump the version over a tiny detail like this. I'm pretty sure there is a way
to r
13 matches
Mail list logo