Re: [Live-devel] Support for VP8 packetization

2014-02-19 Thread Morten S. Laursen
Okay, that makes more sense, it was the partition boundary splitting which I was referring to and not the blocks, please excuse my misuse of terms. I assume the codec on the receiving end would be able to handle the missing partitions using the error concealment method already built into the codec

Re: [Live-devel] Support for VP8 packetization

2014-02-19 Thread Ross Finlayson
> Yes I was referring to the packing of VP8 payloads as done in the referenced > draft. If that is already implemented and used automatically the problem must > lie elsewhere as I am using the VP8VideoRTPSink class as you are referring > to. > As I understand the payload packing it should split

Re: [Live-devel] Support for VP8 packetization

2014-02-19 Thread Morten S. Laursen
Ross, Yes I was referring to the packing of VP8 payloads as done in the referenced draft. If that is already implemented and used automatically the problem must lie elsewhere as I am using the VP8VideoRTPSink class as you are referring to. As I understand the payload packing it should split the fra

Re: [Live-devel] Support for VP8 packetization

2014-02-19 Thread Ross Finlayson
> I am testing with my own live555 based server and openRTSP as the client. > I would therefore like to apply packetization in order to limit the influence > of transmission errors. Is there any support for packetization with VP8 video > streaming such as what google suggests in > http://tools.i

[Live-devel] Support for VP8 packetization

2014-02-19 Thread Morten S. Laursen
Hi I'm currently working with live555 and really appreciate the software, thank you. I currently have the video streaming up and running but as I am streaming over udp on a wifi link I have a significant packet loss. This causes more failed than successfull frames without packetization and effectiv