Ross, Yes I was referring to the packing of VP8 payloads as done in the referenced draft. If that is already implemented and used automatically the problem must lie elsewhere as I am using the VP8VideoRTPSink class as you are referring to. As I understand the payload packing it should split the frames on image block boundaries and therefore a failed packet should only result in that block failing. However the behavior I'm seeing is that in the case of a failed packet the rest of the frame is corrupt. Therefore I assumed that the whole frame was packaged as one, instead of the sub-blocks in individual packets? Kind regards Morten S. Laursen
2014-02-19 11:19 GMT+01:00 Ross Finlayson <finlay...@live555.com>: > I am testing with my own live555 based server and openRTSP as the client. > I would therefore like to apply packetization in order to limit the > influence of transmission errors. Is there any support for packetization > with VP8 video streaming such as what google suggests in > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-vp8 or something similar. > > > Morten, > > I'm a bit puzzled by your question. By "packetization", are you referring > just to the normal packing of VP8 payloads into RTP packets (as described > in the Internet Draft that you referenced)? If so, then that is done > automatically by our software - in particular, by the "VP8VideoRTPSink" > class, which your "live555 based server" should already be using (in your > "createNewRTPSink()" virtual function implementation, assuming that you're > streaming via unicast). > > Or are you referring to something else? > > > Ross Finlayson > Live Networks, Inc. > http://www.live555.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > live-devel mailing list > live-devel@lists.live555.com > http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel > >
_______________________________________________ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel
