Hi All,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Tran Minh Son wrote:
> Dear all,
> First of all, wishing you all a new year full of happiness and
> successes, especially with a lot of advanced features for live555 system.
> I would like to have your confirmation on the creation of Transport
> stream (TS) containing
>Thanks for your speedy reply. Yes I have tried using those two and they work
>just fine with saved files.
>However I m trying to stream a live source
See
http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/faq.html#liveInput
http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/faq.html#liveInput-unicast
You should be
Hi Ross,
Thanks for your speedy reply. Yes I have tried using those two and they work
just fine with saved files.
However I m trying to stream a live source and am setting up a RTSP Server
using Groupsock class.
My current setup works just fine for Multicast on the LAN (as expected).
However w
Hi,
I've seen on the mailing-list archives that some people managed
to implement a FIFO in liveMedia. I would be very interested in
getting any clue about the modifications you have done to the original
code. Even more, I would be pleased to get your source code :-D or
any samples that might help
If i m streaming an mpeg4 file through LIVE ,i want to know
whether the presentation time stamp calculated based on the frames
per second value of mpeg4 input file
Yes. Note the "MPEG4VideoStreamParser" class (in
"MPEG4VideoStreamFramer.cpp").
--
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://ww
Hi,
If i m streaming an mpeg4 file through LIVE ,i want to know whether the
presentation time stamp calculated based on the frames per second value of
mpeg4 input file or is the frames per second(fps) value hardcoded to any
default value?
Regards
gkj
Dear all,
First of all, wishing you all a new year full of happiness and
successes, especially with a lot of advanced features for live555 system.
I would like to have your confirmation on the creation of Transport
stream (TS) containing AVC (Mpeg-4 part 10 for video) elementary stream
in Live55
First I would like to thank you for your attention !
> You should not
>need 'named pipes' for this, if your analysis application reads from
>'stdin'.
The problem is that my application doesn't read from stdin, it reads from a
file,
this i why I thought using the named pipe. And also I can't rely
I want to know whether Live55 has support of WM9 streaming or not.
No, because "WM9" is a proprietary codec that does not have a
publicaly -defined RTP payload format.
--
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/___
live-devel maili
