On Monday 02 May 2016 05:13:46 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> > the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
> > to include renameat.
> >
> > Therefo
On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
> to include renameat.
>
> Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unle
