On Monday 02 May 2016 05:13:46 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> > the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
> > to include renameat.
> >
> > Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless
> > __ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT is defined by the architecture's unistd.h prior to
> > including asm-generic/unistd.h, and adjust all architectures using the
> > generic syscall list to define it so that no in-tree architectures are
> > affected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com> # for arch/arc
Applied to the asm-generic, tree, thanks!
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
