On Monday 02 May 2016 05:13:46 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> > the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
> > to include renameat.
> >
> > Therefo
On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
> to include renameat.
>
> Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unle
The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need
to include renameat.
Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless
__ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT is defined by the architecture's unistd.