Hi Vadim , Shahab
Thanks for the feedback
> > The original code is obviously optimized out, but the intention, I
> > believe, was to check if the jump is conditional or not.
> > So the proper fix should change the code to check cond:
> >
> > - if (ARC_CC_AL)
> > + if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)
Okay
Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> The original code is obviously optimized out, but the intention, I
> believe, was to check if the jump is conditional or not.
> So the proper fix should change the code to check cond:
>
> - if (ARC_CC_AL)
> + if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)
That is absolutely correct. If a new p
