On Fri, 7 Jun 2013, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Stupid question perhaps, but why is soc_camera_device a platform_device?
Partially that's historic.
> It's weird. The camera host device is definitely a platform_device, and
> the video nodes are childs of that platform_device, but soc_camera_device
> do
On Fri June 7 2013 11:41:30 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Fri June 7 2013 11:33:16 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> > > From: Hans Verkuil
> > >
> > > The parent field will eventually disappear to be replaced by v4l2_dev.
> > > soc_camera does provide a v
On Fri June 7 2013 11:33:16 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > From: Hans Verkuil
> >
> > The parent field will eventually disappear to be replaced by v4l2_dev.
> > soc_camera does provide a v4l2_device struct but did not point to it in
> > struct video_
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil
>
> The parent field will eventually disappear to be replaced by v4l2_dev.
> soc_camera does provide a v4l2_device struct but did not point to it in
> struct video_device. This is now fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil
> Cc: Guen
From: Hans Verkuil
The parent field will eventually disappear to be replaced by v4l2_dev.
soc_camera does provide a v4l2_device struct but did not point to it in
struct video_device. This is now fixed.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski
---
drivers/media/platform/soc_camera
