On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Hans Verkuil wrote:

> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> 
> The parent field will eventually disappear to be replaced by v4l2_dev.
> soc_camera does provide a v4l2_device struct but did not point to it in
> struct video_device. This is now fixed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> index 96645e9..ea951ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct file *file)
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
>  
> -     icd = dev_get_drvdata(vdev->parent);
> +     icd = dev_get_drvdata(vdev->v4l2_dev->dev);
>       ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->parent);
>  
>       ret = try_module_get(ici->ops->owner) ? 0 : -ENODEV;
> @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ static int video_dev_create(struct soc_camera_device 
> *icd)
>  
>       strlcpy(vdev->name, ici->drv_name, sizeof(vdev->name));
>  
> -     vdev->parent            = icd->pdev;
> +     vdev->v4l2_dev          = &ici->v4l2_dev;
>       vdev->fops              = &soc_camera_fops;
>       vdev->ioctl_ops         = &soc_camera_ioctl_ops;
>       vdev->release           = video_device_release;

Doesn't it break soc-camera?... I think those are 2 absolutely different 
devices, so, you're not getting icd from 
dev_get_drvdata(vdev->v4l2_dev->dev).

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to