Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > Why didn't you put the RSA signature parsing - ie. where the OID and the
> > other
> > bits are checked - into crypto/rsa.c?
> >
>
> Do you want to get rid of the crypto/asymmetric_keys/rsa.c completely?
> I wanted to make the conversion churn as small as possible.
> I
David Howells wrote:
> Tadeusz Struk wrote:
>
> > > Why didn't you put the RSA signature parsing - ie. where the OID and the
> > > other
> > > bits are checked - into crypto/rsa.c?
> > >
> >
> > Do you want to get rid of the crypto/asymmetric_keys/rsa.c completely?
> > I wanted to make the c
If either the Subject + subjectKeyId or the Issuer + Serial number
differs between the certificate and the CA, the certificate is not
self-signed. In practice, both will be equal for self-signed
certificates and both will differ for CA-signed certificates. It is only
an issue if the CA used the sam
Add documentation for the Freescale Security Controller (SCC)
found on i.MX25 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar
---
.../devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-imx-scc.txt | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fs
According to the Freescale GPL driver code, there are two different
Security Controller (SCC) versions: SCC and SCC2.
The SCC is found on older i.MX SoCs, e.g. the i.MX25. This is the
version implemented and tested here.
As there is no publicly available documentation for this IP core,
all inform
Add the Security Controller (SCC) module to the dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25.dtsi | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25.dtsi
index cde329e9b9e3..73118aba4cc4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/b
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:04:45 +0100 Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> According to the Freescale GPL driver code, there are two different
> Security Controller (SCC) versions: SCC and SCC2.
>
> The SCC is found on older i.MX SoCs, e.g. the i.MX25. This is the
> version implemented and tested here.
>
