David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote: > Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.st...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Why didn't you put the RSA signature parsing - ie. where the OID and the > > > other > > > bits are checked - into crypto/rsa.c? > > > > > > > Do you want to get rid of the crypto/asymmetric_keys/rsa.c completely? > > I wanted to make the conversion churn as small as possible. > > I can move it in a subsequent patch if you want. > > I was thinking of getting rid of it completely, yes. > > But I was wondering if you had some other motivation, such as keeping the > crypto layer purely the mathematical operation. > > It's an interesting question where to draw the line, actually. The answer may > hinge on what things like the TPM do. I should ask the TPM folks.
Looking in the TPM emulator, the TPM_Sign operation indeed puts the wrappings on, so this needs to go into the crypto layer. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
